cajunrevenge
Well-known member
For as bad as Olson has been he still has a .740 OPS. One hot streak and he will be back above .800.
For as bad as Olson has been he still has a .740 OPS. One hot streak and he will be back above .800.
As bad as our offense has been, we are winning at a 98 win pace…. Just sucks the Phillies are winning at a 117 win pace
We need him to not be really good for 2-3 weeks and crap for 2 months and then say but look his stats aren't too bad. unless one of those really really good weeks fall in Oct. I would prefer good over 6 months personally.
Phillies are playing out of their minds. But they have only played 1 team that is currently over .500 and that's the Braves the first series of the year. Their next team that's currently over .500 will be the Brewers the fist week of June. So they have gone 2 months playing average at best teams. How does that happen.
The best measurement of a good team is beating the teams you’re supposed to beat convincingly.
The best measurement of a good team is beating the teams you’re supposed to beat convincingly.
Phillies are playing out of their minds. But they have only played 1 team that is currently over .500 and that's the Braves the first series of the year. Their next team that's currently over .500 will be the Brewers the fist week of June. So they have gone 2 months playing average at best teams. How does that happen.
They’re a good team. They’re nowhere near a 117 win team.
Not playing a team above .500 for two months is wild.
I'd rather just play well in October. Beating the **** ouf of the poor teams of the league doesn't do anything for me anymore
I’m aware of that. They’re definitely playing over their heads by a decent margin. I just don’t like the argument that they’re not good because they are beating bad teams.
Who is saying they aren't good?
I’m just saying that people are detracting from their success because of it. I don’t think that’s fair.
The best measurement of a good team is beating the teams you’re supposed to beat convincingly.
I think I talked myself into not wanting to win the division. I know that is one more series the team could get bounced in but if they loose a wild card series then I assume they weren’t going to win a division or championship series. Let the Phillies sit for over a week and then have to face a team that pretty much already reset their pitching.
Hopefully once these 100+ win teams get bounced again mlb and Dickfred will make winning more valuable.[/QUOT
Not wanting the division...smh. If I were running MLB you would win a division or you would be home on your couch. When realignment comes 4 division winners, 8 team playoff is all baseball needs.
I think I talked myself into not wanting to win the division. I know that is one more series the team could get bounced in but if they loose a wild card series then I assume they weren’t going to win a division or championship series. Let the Phillies sit for over a week and then have to face a team that pretty much already reset their pitching.
Hopefully once these 100+ win teams get bounced again mlb and Dickfred will make winning more valuable.[/QUOT
Not wanting the division...smh. If I were running MLB you would win a division or you would be home on your couch. When realignment comes 4 division winners, 8 team playoff is all baseball needs.
well you are not running the league and thus the playoff format is watered down with tons of off days baked in.. it holds zero benefit for a division winner outside of homefield (minimal advantage) and not playing a bad team in a 3 game series.
At this point catching them is going to come down to the head-to-head plus the next 11 games. We have to deal with PIT, WSH, and OAK how they have dealt with lesser competition to have any shot.