So they were virtually identical in their first 125-145 PAs. Thanks
Except one of them was lucky and headed for obvious regression where the other one hasn't been so far. Yup. Virtually identical.
So they were virtually identical in their first 125-145 PAs. Thanks
Except one of them was lucky and headed for obvious regression where the other one hasn't been so far. Yup. Virtually identical.
Guess so. Beware then... Albies last 100 PAs, his BABIP is .375.
You are right. I wouldn't expect an 850 OPS from him right now either.
You literally just said Albies hasn't been lucky.
I expect both to be round .775-815 ops and 3-3.5 war next season
You literally just said Albies hasn't been lucky.
I expect both to be round .775-815 ops and 3-3.5 war next season
can I have the under .800 for both
I'll give you the under .775 on Swanson. I'm not ready to say .800 on either... just round .800
done
We'll figure out the terms by opener '18
Albies might be easier to sign since he hasnt made a lot of money yet. Same goes for Acuna.
If Swanson has a big year in 2018-19, he'll be more expensive to try and keep.
Honestly, I would throw away September stats period, because since it has September call ups involved that may be AAAA it can skew stats.
Swanson has produced 1.1 fWAR in a years worth of games in his career. 10 million a year for 1 WAR is going to be a bargain on the back half of that 10 year contract
Obviously Albies. He's probably a little better prepared since he had 695 PA in AAA before taking an MLB AB.
I'm not trying to turn this into a competition of the two. I love them both. I do think the Swanson we see of late is much closer to the real Swanson.
He may get .700 outright BTW
.663 since our bet
.630 in September, not exactly a strong finish
.663 since our bet
.630 in September, not exactly a strong finish
Yep, I'm done