zbhargrove
Well-known member
You're undervaluing Wood. He has performed far closer to Hamels and even Price than you think.
Let's not go crazy here...
You're undervaluing Wood. He has performed far closer to Hamels and even Price than you think.
Have say there's something seriously wrong with your memory, then, Be it short-term (Teixeira) or timeless (Barker).
So, for 2016:
M. Smith CF
Maybin RF
Freeman 1B
Olivera 3B
Markakis LF
Peterson 2B
Simba SS
C-Beth C
IF we go after a really solid catcher and succeed, that's honestly not a bad lineup.
If we can solidify the rotation with a true anchor, we'd be set as well.
I'm not happy about the trade, but I do understand it. We NEED Olivera to be a boss.
You're undervaluing Wood. He has performed far closer to Hamels and even Price than you think.
We get it. The FO does no wrong.
It doesn't matter what we traded for Uribe... he had value and we gave him away.
Regardless of that deal though - which doesn't mean a lot. This is one of the worst deals I can remember. I can't fathom how LAD talked Peraza into the deal.
You're undervaluing Wood. He has performed far closer to Hamels and even Price than you think.
The deal is quite a bit more attractive with the inclusion of Arroyo.... still worried Olivera can't stay healthy, though. Sounds like they examined the hell out of his medical charts, though.
The deal is quite a bit more attractive with the inclusion of Arroyo.... still worried Olivera can't stay healthy, though. Sounds like they examined the hell out of his medical charts, though.
The value we got for a Wood and Peraza is far less than their actual value.
Difference then was we were going for it - trying to win. Which as a fan, I can at least appreciate.
This was not a move that needed to be made right now. Could have been made in the offseason - or later. We didn't get the value we should have.
The deal is quite a bit more attractive with the inclusion of Arroyo.... still worried Olivera can't stay healthy, though. Sounds like they examined the hell out of his medical charts, though.
I get the FIP and xFIP stuff, but Hamels is a legitimate workhorse and ace where as Wood is not that. Hamels for the playoffs is a huge step up over Wood for the playoffs. As I've always said, there's more to being a frontline SP than peripherals. Price and Hamels consistently go deep into games and have long, sustained success. Wood is not on their level.
Just to repeat, difference of about $10m in actual completed trade versus what was discussed last night. Call it getting Touki, call it Hector for 5 for$22m. Whatever you call it, it's a significant change in this deal in the Braves favor.
Jeff Passan @JeffPassan 2m2 minutes ago
Between the ~$30M in signing bonus savings and Dodgers taking on Arroyo deal, Braves gave up Wood/Peraza to get Olivera for 5 years, ~$22M.
Because you can't steal first base.
Peraza projects to .290-.300 OBP in the big leagues. And he'll slug .330-.350.
Can't hit leadoff with that.
BTW, Paco (Go Gators) is a LH relief stud. You can look it up.
Bird is a lottery ticket. Arroyo money is awesome to lose, if they reinvest.
We know they're stockpiling picks.
So the Johns clearly have a Woody for Olivera.
They only need to right about one half of the equation to win. Either Olivera is a stud or Wood goes flaccid.
I'm just not going to pretend I know this is the case when we can see how well these guys have done in trades very recently.
Teixiera, Samardzija, Doyle Alexander, Randy Johnson...check out those deals and tell me the big-name player was the better end. Now give me the list of big rentals who led their team to the WS.
My only worry is that we save all this money by trading away these guys and Liberty doesn't do anything with it. My confidence in Liberty actually letting us spend is at 0. I'm sure they are thrilled with all the savings as of late...
But being a workhorse doesn't matter in the playoffs. The gap between Hamels and Wood is bigger over the course of a full season than it is in a one-game scenario. Wood gives you pretty equivalent value in that case.