Murdoc
12:07 Which is a worse idea, Matt Adams in left or Freddie Freeman at third?
Dave Cameron
12:08 Adams in left. Freeman was an average-ish first baseman, maybe even above average, with a strong arm. If he's a -10 3B, okay, well, that's still better than what they had.
And it's not like -10 3Bs don't get played.
I feel confident he would be a good bit worse than -10 at 3B. Even removing the severe lack of range from the equation, the last time he played 3B was in the GCL for 5 games...he had 3 errors in those 5 games.
It just came to me... If FF is at 3B and KEMvP in LF.. think of how much closer FF is to KEMvP now. He can engage full protection both on offense and defense...
I'm not sure why the idea of having Matt Adams on the bench is such a bad thing. He'd be the best bench bat we've had in 4 years.
I'm not sure why the idea of having Matt Adams on the bench is such a bad thing. He'd be the best bench bat we've had in 4 years.
Having his .900+ ops in every day lineup with FF and KEMvP would be even better. I doubt it will work though
Having his .900+ ops in every day lineup with FF and KEMvP would be even better. I doubt it will work though
900 ops...
1. I don't think this will happen, and is probably just the Braves trying to drive the price of Adam's up for teams that want him with the "Fine, we'll just keep him." bluff.
2. It's not "so" far fetched because Freddie was a 3rd baseman. He knows the position and was probably moved because they had Chipper. Let's say he's horrible. We probably win a few games with Adams bat and loose a few with Freddie's mishaps at 3rd. It's probably a wash and even if it looses us a few...just gives us a better draft pick. We then keep Adams as a bench bat or trade him in the offseason.
3. I doubt it happens, but a lineup with Adams, Kemp and Freddie in the middle (assuming Adams doesn't regress...which is possible), would be pretty nasty. Where is the weak spot 1-8 with Dansby hitting now.
.910