My prediction is irrelevant in the argument. As an economic principle do you believe demand has no impact on price?
Only if supply can't meet demand. There is plenty of 5th starter rental supply out there.
My prediction is irrelevant in the argument. As an economic principle do you believe demand has no impact on price?
Make a prediction genius. I assume you're smart enough to understand what a prediction is?
What is the value of the return Garcia will net the Braves now that his value has increased?
You're so smart and I'm so stupid, so educate me.
Lol and here I thought the answers would be completely subjective and impossible to quantify.
Oh wait, that's exactly what your answer is.
Only if demand can't meet supply. There is plenty of 5th starter rental supply out there.
Do you believe the reports that additional teams have shown interest in Garcia is false?
Of course. Doesn't mean Garcias value is any higher
So who are the additional starters that were made available in the last 24 hours that offset the increased demand?
Do I sense a "leave the board forever bet coming?"![]()
Only if supply can't meet demand. There is plenty of 5th starter rental supply out there.
Lol look, go ahead and predict the better return the Braves are going to get.
You have never, ever, been right on a topic involving player value when you've disagreed with me. Not once.
So let's try again.
How valuable is Garcia now?
How good a prospect is is entirely subjective.
You made the argument that increased demand does impact price unless additonal supply offsets it.
Then you agreed the demand has increased for Garcia based on believing reports but st star that doesn't necessarily increase Garcia value. Based on your previous comment that would lead me to believe you think the supply has ibcreased.
So who else was made avaliable because if it's nobody else then based on your logic Garcias value has increased.
It's mind bottling someone is trying argue increased demand isn't a good thing
Very simple question you keep skirting around...
How much better of a prospect is he going to get in return now that his value has increased?
Excellent straw man. I didn't say the extra demand isn't a good thing. I said it doesn't increase Garcias value.
The Braves likely now have a larger selection of similarly valued prospects to pick from. That's unquestionably a good thing, but still the same value.
Work on your reading comprehension? Maybe? Someday?
I'm not interested in that argument because it's extremely subjective. I'm have a basic economic discussion with you here and I'd like to continue that conversation.
What additional supply was injected into the deadline economy that offsets the increased demand for Garcia?
So his value isn't increased AT ALL by 8 teams wanting him now instead of 1?