GeorgiaGirl
NL Rookie of the Year
Biddle has been nails. I have no problem with him getting some high leverage gigs.
Maybe you have him go the 7th, but it's not a bad move to have him pitch in setup, and people are trashing it.
Biddle has been nails. I have no problem with him getting some high leverage gigs.
I agree that Venters was the right move. Just saying Biddle has been doing well and was rested. So it was not indefensible to go to him.
He may be a raging racist, but Hader is insanely good.
you realize his tweets were quoting rap lyrics right?
Biddle has been nails. I have no problem with him getting some high leverage gigs.
You must have become Snit's biggest fan.
Be a numbers-guy or don't be one, none of us know *hit. You guys just can't scream at everybody for not following the numbers and then give someone a pass when they don't.
Does Biddle still have reverse splits? Did AA go get Venters to get lefties out and was he rested?
Then it's indefensible.
So you're saying he isn't really a "hader?"
Venters was the optimal guy.
But Biddle was not a bad choice because:
1) He has been good
2) He is rested
3) 2 of the first four guys up were righties.
Otoh 2 of the first 3 were lefties. So I preferred Venters, who is also good and rested and has conventional splits.
This one stings because it was there for the taking.
Maybe you have him go the 7th, but it's not a bad move to have him pitch in setup, and people are trashing it.
He may be a raging racist, but Hader is insanely good.
His face and tats screams trailer trash.
With a .234 BABIP who was bound to regress, which we just saw. When you're playing a good team you have to go with what the stats say and not with feelings.
I can't make my position any clearer. The optimal move imo was Venters. Biddle was sub-optimal but not indefensible. That's how I see it. There is a world out there between sub-optimal and indefensible.