Georgia 6th

I don't see what is so hard to understand about both parties having something to be concerned with, the Democrats probably more so, and this not being some landmark race one way or the other.

It's like people have no perspective in politics anymore.
 
bravesnumberone said:
I don't see what is so hard to understand about both parties having something to be concerned with, the Democrats probably more so, and this not being some landmark race one way or the other.

It's like people have no perspective in politics anymore.
Click to expand...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/powe...f_story.html?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.d55e825abf72

Handel tied Ossoff to the shooting of (R) congress baseball team, Ossoff never really fought back let alone throw a first punch.
The same could be said about Montana

That ad and the subsequent non response caught my eye
 
57Brave said:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/powe...f_story.html?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.d55e825abf72

Handel tied Ossoff to the shooting of (R) congress baseball team, Ossoff never really fought back let alone throw a first punch.
The same could be said about Montana

That ad and the subsequent non response caught my eye
Click to expand...

That ad was despicable but not even close to the reason he lost. Also wasn't it a PAC that did that ad, not her? I understand she should have condemned it and didn't. I can't read the article because I'm at my monthly limit with the Post.
 
thethe said:
Hollywood elites trying to buy another manchurian candidate and the American people said no.
Click to expand...

This chart I posted last night shows Handel had more than a 2-1 edge in funding for a seat they won by 23 points 6 months ago

DCzF_BSUMAEe-uu.jpg


What was Jim Rome's radio catch phrase

"have a take and don't suck"
 
bravesnumberone said:
That ad was despicable but not even close to the reason he lost. Also wasn't it a PAC that did that ad, not her? I understand she should have condemned it and didn't. I can't read the article because I'm at my monthly limit with the Post.
Click to expand...

Oh no, not saying that ad was the reason. I'm still on Putin seeded the clouds :)
That ad is just one example of NPR Democrats that continue to feel they must run civil campaigns against scorched earth candidates.

The article also points out how toxic Nancy Pelosi was in this and most house campaigns.
Pelosi more toxic than Trump
Think about that

Also == Ossoff publicly stated he woouldn't support Single Payer HC. Just another NicePoliteRepublican.

I get that he is 30 and all and 99% of promenant (D) are over 65 but I personally was never enammored with Ossoff
Always saw Joe Lieberman in him. Perhaps the most despicable mamby pamby pol of the 21st century.
 
One problem he had was he had to run moderate to really get close but his strongest base of support, millennialis like my two dozen or so FB friends who live in the district, was very progressive and acted like this election was life and death. They were doom and gloom last night. Not sure if they woke up today.
 
also read an interesting article last night on the gerrymandered demographic of the seat. Gingrich fingerprints.
Where by design it marginalizes white democratic vote.

I have family in that district. A year ago a (D) risked their life and property displaying their politics.
There was a marked change in yard signs and get out the vote meetings this time

I just think for too long (D) politics and policy have not been as aggressive as I'd like
Punch the bastards in the rhetorical face
 
Campaign finance filings show that as of May 31, Democrat Jon Ossoff had raised more than $23 million since entering the race to replace Rep. Tom Price, who vacated the seat to become secretary of Health and Human Services. Republican Karen Handel had pulled in over $4.5 million.

Far more than you say Ossoff had
 
I don't say!! These are numbers submitted by each campaign
Do you know what the Federal Elections Commission is and what it does ?
The chart is through June 20.


and like I said if you have other verifiable numbers - show them
 
goldfly said:
7 months ago this district went for Republicans by 23 points

no one is in here claiming republicans are smart
Click to expand...

We definitely know the Dems aren't. They are two busy trying to figure out how Russia hack the system.

To be honest and I am serious, Dems are too sheep like to have any intelligence whatsoever. Their naivety worries me when they become adults. They just don't understand life. They stomp their feet and cry when they don't get their way and most of the time have a litany of excuses if they lose or try deflection. They want government to take care of you when you are too lazy to do anything. And heaven forbid, if you say the wrong thing, they blow a whistle and send the ACLU or LGBT advocates after you. A bunch of spineless pussies in my book.
 
57Brave said:
Both of those articles data is through May 31.
FEC filings are dated June 20.
Click to expand...

Link because you can pick and choose on how you present reports from that site.

I see hogwash and fudging of data by you since the numbers I presented to you is way more than what you are posting and as you said as of yesterday. That is not possible.
 
Well looky here, 57 is a fraud again. I went to the FEC site and guess what I found:

Export

Viewing about 1,000 results

Name State Receipts Disbursements

OSSOFF, T. JONATHAN GA $23,600,861.14 $22,532,609.57 Toggle details

GIANFORTE, GREG MT $6,813,960.66 $5,161,704.52 Toggle details

HANDEL, KAREN CHRISTINE GA $4,555,808.76 $3,158,847.03 Toggle details



57 you are a fuc*king liar. Quit posting FAKE sh*t.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top