Georgia 6th

It already was linked. The footnote at the bottom of the chart says June 20 Federal Elections Commission.
 
I was surprised to see 57s chart as almost everyone reported oosoff received way more funding. You know the story. ...dems are the party of the wealthy aND elite. Just look at the funding for the 2016 presidential race.
 
Handel had late monies come in from various national PACs and took advantage of Citizens United related contributions.

Not the reason Ossoff lost and not worth y'all getting your panties in a wad.
 
thethe said:
I was surprised to see 57s chart as almost everyone reported oosoff received way more funding. You know the story. ...dems are the party of the wealthy aND elite. Just look at the funding for the 2016 presidential race.
Click to expand...

Because the chart does not exist anywhere. It is fake reporting. Yet you go to the FEC site, which is up to date that counters that chart. The individual could manipulate the data to show the fake numbers. Considering that 57 common sense is 0 and a Democrat sheep turd licker it doesn't surprise me he tried to put one over people. It is his MO.

I put more credence in newspapers, the actual FEC site than some Dummicrat blogster in tweeting reports.

Now 57 is flustered because his gig is up and he is posting fake news. So he tries to play it off by deflecting.

Dude, get off the blogs and post real correct sh*t, not that fake ass stuff you have been doing.
 
After scrounging around the internet, nothing on this dark money, nothing on this "late" money.

He loss, quit making excuses and making up lies.
 
57Brave said:
Handel had late monies come in from various national PACs and took advantage of Citizens United related contributions.

Not the reason Ossoff lost and not worth y'all getting your panties in a wad.
Click to expand...

Only wad you have is what Ossoff did in your mouth. Did you swallow?

We are just asking you to quit posting fake news or WRONG news without any verifiable links. Blogs from Liberals does not constitute the truth, far from it.

I brought my links to the fight, you have a chart that has no link and that little blurb at the bottom doesn't mean sh*t.
 
AerchAngel said:
After scrounging around the internet, nothing on this dark money, nothing on this "late" money.

He loss, quit making excuses and making up lies.
Click to expand...

At a time that was supposed to indicate a rebuke of Trump's agenda. This is a bad sign for dems. If this administration gets through some legislation and the economy keeps humming then 2018 is not going to be a fun election cycle for the dems. But don't worry...the media and the establishment will keep creating polls showing how much trump is hated and how all Republicans are losing elections.
 
AerchAngel said:
After scrounging around the internet, nothing on this dark money, nothing on this "late" money.

He loss, quit making excuses and making up lies.
Click to expand...

a) wasn't dark money - sorry if that is what you thought I meant. All above board and legal. Don't think anyone anywhere has insinuated otherwise

b) he lost. I think I was the first to post it wasn't looking good and like I said earlier today, Ossoff was not my ideal candidate. Better than Handel but not my cuppa tea

c) no excuses - hoped the seat went Blue - it didn't. No need to lie about a 5 point loss
 
thethe said:
At a time that was supposed to indicate a rebuke of Trump's agenda. This is a bad sign for dems. If this administration gets through some legislation and the economy keeps humming then 2018 is not going to be a fun election cycle for the dems. But don't worry...the media and the establishment will keep creating polls showing how much trump is hated and how all Republicans are losing elections.
Click to expand...

Not as worried. It's a seat the GOP have had since the 70's.

I am satisfied with how much the deficit was cut. If Trump gains seats in Mid terms in the House I'll be a bit worried. Senate I am not expecting the Dems to do much. Too many red states the R's are defending.
 
Forever Fredi said:
Not as worried. It's a seat the GOP have had since the 70's.

I am satisfied with how much the deficit was cut. If Trump gains seats in Mid terms in the House I'll be a bit worried. Senate I am not expecting the Dems to do much. Too many red states the R's are defending.
Click to expand...

A lot can change in 2 years but who is going to run for 2020 pres?
 
If we were gonna go the business route I'd probably want Elon Musk to run if he were legally eligible. There's a real self made billionaire that didn't need a million dollar loan (10 million in today's numbers).
 
jpx7 said:
Bernie would've won and Bernie will win.
Click to expand...

Hard to argue the first point. I'm sure the DNC will screw Bernie again. The establishment is strong and a cadidate like bernie hurts the bottom line. Basically what trump is facing right now just in a different form.
 
Why would 79 year old Bernie want to run for President ?

It is physically demanding campaigning for President
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top