FreemanFan
Danville Rookie
On what planet and in what way is Hillary Clinton even remotely conservative?
I've longed loathed how the email "scandal" has been used as a political cudgel—especially since, as noted, there's a lot of shoe/other-foot hypocrisy at play amongst many of those most vocal about Clinton's private email server and the attendant lapses in judgment—but if you want to know why it matters, this article details pretty thoroughly why the non-prosecution of Clinton is sort of a big small deal.
This would be hilarious if it wasn't so sad..
not one bit.
It is a non issue- the proverbial tempest in a tea pot, faux outrage of the day and
the other guy is ... (you fill in the blank)
I've longed loathed how the email "scandal" has been used as a political cudgel—especially since, as noted, there's a lot of shoe/other-foot hypocrisy at play amongst many of those most vocal about Clinton's private email server and the attendant lapses in judgment—but if you want to know why it matters, this article details pretty thoroughly why the non-prosecution of Clinton is sort of a big small deal.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2817999/posts
according to all of the investigations no law was broken
let's move on
....
as was the case in
Travelgate
Whitewater
Rose Law Firm
Vince Foster
Benghazi.
smuggling
rigging elections
paying hush money to rape victums
etc
etc
etc c
why not try to out smart her instead of dealing in any flimsy accusation?
What is Libertarian or (R) policy on Pre School Education
What is (L) or (R) policy of upgrading the electrical grid in the Rust Belt
What is (L) or (R) policy on the proliferation of war weapons in our cities
But I guess it is easier both intellectually and civilly to draw a Jokers face or critique her apparel - or dig through her closet.
Both literally and metaphorically
....
Face it, your school of thought is out of ideas to move our society forward
Pretty simple really
"We the people ... "
I forget the rest of that sentence
can you help a brother out ?
Matthew Yglesias Verified account
@mattyglesias
Balanced MSM take: On the one hand, Trump is a wildly unqualified racist demagogue. On the other, Clinton was sloppy with emails.
And by sloppy with emails you mean she purposely tried to circumvent freedom of information requests. That's what the issue should really be about.
See below.
As much as I don't like Hillary this is just another gotcha game angle. Reality is all 3 candidates are criminals. Everyone here is a criminal. It is figuratively impossible to not be a criminal. People commit numerous felonies over their lifetime and don't even know it. Unfortunately unless you have a badge intent to follow the law or ignorance of one of te 40,000+ laws you don't get qualified immunity.
I **** you not less than a month ago I tried to argue intent to follow the law in a traffic ticket case. I turned into a school zone and by the time I had finished the turn I was pulled over. Said I was going 31 in a 20 zone. The sign was to my left facing the other direction and the next one was a half mile down the road. I think we all know how that went down. Also was nearly held in contempt of court because I kept calling it a tax instead of fine. It's not a tax but for some reason city and state officials talk about needing a new tax to replace traffic fine revenue when self driving cars takeover the roads.
I parked in front of a Thai restaurant last week for maybe the 5th time and never noticed parking meters in front. Was parked there no longer than it took to be seated when I saw someone circling my car. When I went to see what it was about it was the Meter Police giving me a ticket.
Not noticing something like a parking meter was sloppy on my part
That's the government for you. Old, inefficient, ineffective, incompetent dinosaurs.
But is hard to fix it for a number of reasons.
First is we are living in an information world that moves faster than it did 20 minutes ago.
Secondly we are trying to govern this world with a 240 year old document designed to move deliberatly
Thirdly -- our people elected to deal with these problems are more interested in repealing a law instead of streamlining and improving
or investigating (knowingly: see Kevin McCarthy) non existent crimes for electoral purposes.
Curious Libertarian guy, how would a Libertarian legislature have dealt with
a) ACA
b) Benghazi
?
.......
You fall back on "The Constitution" when convenient yet become impatient with "The Constitution" from discussion to discussion.
Not really sure your stance on "The Constitution"