HRC

weso1 said:
Why should we? You're honestly going to tell me that we shouldn't have questions? Don't be a homer.
Click to expand...
?

I was not referring to you. "They" means those other people at the State Dept.

The funny thing is if they keep attacking Clinton and find a way to bring her down, they're just going to get Bernie and his socialist revolution. Rs would be wise to keep Clinton.
 
weso1 said:
Why should we? You're honestly going to tell me that we shouldn't have questions? Don't be a homer.
Click to expand...

13620784_10208606525419290_6572425069212321126_n.jpg
 
weso1 said:
Why should we? You're honestly going to tell me that we shouldn't have questions? Don't be a homer.
Click to expand...

... differed from Clinton’s accidental disclosure of a few innocuous documents that probably shouldn’t have been classified at all. Indeed, he retreated from his criticism of Clinton, to a degree, when he conceded under Democratic questioning that out of tens of thousands of documents, only three were arguably “classified” when they crossed her email account — and that those three were incorrectly marked. Based on the inconspicuous and incorrect markings, the FBI director could scarcely defend the notion that she should have known those pages were classified.

http://www.nationalmemo.com/what-the-republican-assault-on-james-comey-reveals-about-todays-gop/

................................

and all of this is besides the point.
The point being, why do people literally have hate for a person they've never met and has literally harmed no one.
I don't get it

or, maybe I do
 
The point being, why do people literally have hate for a person they've never met and has literally harmed no one.
I don't get it

[/QUOTE]

Why should I like someone who says republicans are their number one enemy? You might want to ask the person who made that statement.
 
25 years of witch hunting, trying to tear her family apart and general demonization, my thoughts are "number one enemy" a more restrained and civil charactorization than I am pretty sure either of us would be
 
57Brave said:
25 years of witch hunting, trying to tear her family apart and general demonization, my thoughts are "number one enemy" a more restrained and civil charactorization than I am pretty sure either of us would be
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
Bernie Sanders to endorse Clinton next Tuesday... or maybe he'll wait to see what happens in the perjury probe.
 
wonder if his delay in endorsement had something to do with FBI probe and the timing synchronized with/by DNC ?
in the least 30 days His work with the platform/convention hasn't stalled
BS rhetoric has been low key

I hope I live long enough to read about this election in hindsight of 10 years or so
 
Ultimately, instead of charging Hillary Clinton, the prosecutors decided to focus their energies on the Lewinsky issue.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...beb7c8-4498-11e6-88d0-6adee48be8bc_story.html

...........................................................................

DavidinCambridge

8:50 AM EDT

After thoroughly investigating Clinton for decades, Republicans (and recall Comey and Starr are both lifelong Republicans) have been unable to find anything to indict her for. Hillary doesn't always show the best judgment, but she is the most vetted, and hence one of the least corrupt, politicians in modern history.

Seriously, if three decades of non-stop investigation hasn't turned up anything illegal, the only plausible explanation is that she hasn't done anything illegal.

DavidinCambridge

8:50 AM EDT

After thoroughly investigating Clinton for decades, Republicans (and recall Comey and Starr are both lifelong Republicans) have been unable to find anything to indict her for. Hillary doesn't always show the best judgment, but she is the most vetted, and hence one of the least corrupt, politicians in modern history.

Seriously, if three decades of non-stop investigation hasn't turned up anything illegal, the only plausible explanation is that she hasn't done anything illegal.

DavidinCambridge

8:50 AM EDT

After thoroughly investigating Clinton for decades, Republicans (and recall Comey and Starr are both lifelong Republicans) have been unable to find anything to indict her for. Hillary doesn't always show the best judgment, but she is the most vetted, and hence one of the least corrupt, politicians in modern history.

Seriously, if three decades of non-stop investigation hasn't turned up anything illegal, the only plausible explanation is that she hasn't done anything illegal.
 
I'm convinced they don't just manipulate for Hillary, but for the left as a whole. I've noticed when I research facts the more left leaning websites tend to pop up first. That's anecdotal, but it just seems to happen a lot.
 
57Brave said:
Just think if this much curiosity worked on solving our aging and crumbling Rust Belt, applied to science of climate change or found a way to put the NRA in their place
Click to expand...

I mean... it was a satire video channel that found it. Sorry it hurts your agenda... but Hilary's corruption trail never seems to end.

It's fun watching all of her lies about the emails though.. I can't imagine why nobody trusts her.

"But TRUMP!"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top