When you want to make a political point, but also don’t want to lie for once?
Impeachment
- Thread starter 57Brave
- Start date
When you want to make a political point, but also don’t want to lie for once?
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
[tw]1197875745344884738[/tw]
Having had a chance to watch them in their primes in the 1990s, it bears repeating that Rudy and chosen one have always had a screw or two loose. It didn't prevent them from functioning. But they are well past their primes now and have experienced significant decline, both physical and mental. And they reinforce each other's worst tendencies.
Having had a chance to watch them in their primes in the 1990s, it bears repeating that Rudy and chosen one have always had a screw or two loose. It didn't prevent them from functioning. But they are well past their primes now and have experienced significant decline, both physical and mental. And they reinforce each other's worst tendencies.
Last edited:
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
Among other things the owner of Crowdstrike is Russian not Ukrainian.
It is perfectly within his prerogative for chosen one to believe whatever he wants to. Though I will refrain from drawing any sort of conclusion about whether his belief that the Ukrainians have anything to do with the DNC server is a sincere one.
But there is a word that needs to be introduced into this discussion. Predicate or predicated. Legal investigations need to have a factual basis, a predicate. Once the basis becomes one man's whim, we are no longer proceeding according to rule of law. We are proceeding according to its opposite. Which is rule of man, or autocracy.
It is perfectly within his prerogative for chosen one to believe whatever he wants to. Though I will refrain from drawing any sort of conclusion about whether his belief that the Ukrainians have anything to do with the DNC server is a sincere one.
But there is a word that needs to be introduced into this discussion. Predicate or predicated. Legal investigations need to have a factual basis, a predicate. Once the basis becomes one man's whim, we are no longer proceeding according to rule of law. We are proceeding according to its opposite. Which is rule of man, or autocracy.
Last edited:
But the Prez colluding with Russia and participating in Quid Pro Quo with Ukraine are outlandish witch hunts, even though we have evidence to support both of those claims..... lol
What evidence has been produced that the Ukraine has servers or that the Bidens acted illegally? The President literally said "Thats what they say" and "That's what the word is." Who is "they" and where is this "word" coming from? Like all conspiracy theories, no one actually knows where it started, it just keeps being passed around on Twitter, Facebook, and chain emails until enough people start claiming them as fact.
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
I've had the opportunity to spend part of my professional life in the proximity of an individual who bears some resemblance to chosen one in terms of sometimes believing in things that have no basis. Those beliefs always appear to be sincere.
However, and the however is as relevant with chosen one. Whenever that individual has put forth such unfounded beliefs it has always been the case that these beliefs work to his advantage or are convenient to him. There has never been an instance where he has held an unfounded belief that works against his interests.
I have drawn an inference from this.
Last edited:
You realize that there has been ongoing investigations by Duram and Barr right?
You realize this conspiracy has been around long before Duram and Barr started their investigations right?
Again I ask, who is "They" and where is this "word" coming from? It's awfully convenient to spew conspiracy theories as facts and then claim that's what "they" are saying and "that's the word."
Absolutely and now the perpetrators are not the investigators. Report hasn't even been released and we know there is evidence showing an fbi agent falsified records. Where does the rabbit hole go?
striker42
Well-known member
This is a form of confirmation bias. These people probably legitimately believe the things that benefit them. They just believe it because they want to.
LOL stop.
Former Trump campaign officials are on record stating they planned their campaign around the Russian Hacks and George Papadopoulos was indicted for lying about contact with individuals with Russian ties.
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
Good questions.
Hahaha...back to PAPA.
As of that hasn't been clearly shown to be a obama admin setup. And if you still dont believe it buckle up for what's to come.
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
So we also have a claim from chosen one that Yovanovitch refused to hang his picture at the embassy in Kyiv. Of course it's not true.
So what should we call this:
1) Confirmation bias
2) Sincerely but erroneously held belief
3) Lie
4) Cooly crafted smear of another human being
5) The truth
6) Other
7) All of the above
Last edited:
LOL, more conspiracy. Nevermind the fact that the other campaign aids are on record stating they clearly planned their campaign around the Russian hacks. But sure, Obama plant. Let's just ignore all the other ACTUAL evidence in favor of conspiracy theories that have zero basis other than "that's the word."
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
thethe's beliefs are proof of some deep law about chaos and the lack of order in the universe
may the peace and blessings of Allah be upon him