Impeachment

Before 2018 mid terms



IMPOTUS - "go out and vote because if Democrats get the house they will impeach me"



*House Democrats win big taking the majority*


*POTUS impeached becoming IMPOTUS*





So yes, elections have consequences and the American people choose Democrats to run the house. Get over it
 
Runnin said:
The executive branch must remember than it is only 1 branch of 3. It's crazy to turn over all powers of government to whomever can win the highly, highly flawed presidential election process. Trump seems to think he's in charge of everything if he wants to be.

All candidates for President should have to take and pass tests to prove they understand how the government is designed to work, from a basic understanding of governmental administration to a history of foreign policy. The U.S. needs to realize that another Trump is very likely and any demagogue type candidate needs special preparation for the office and should not even be considered UNTIL that candidate has proven capable of digesting some BASIC FACTS OF THE JOB.
Click to expand...

We should be lucky to get another trump in comparison to the prior 2 administrations.
 
thethe said:
We should be lucky to get another trump in comparison to the prior 2 administrations.
Click to expand...

You prefer criminal and impeachment to the status quo?

Screen-Shot-2019-10-27-at-6.38.08-PM-1.jpeg
 
Runnin said:
You prefer criminal and impeachment to the status quo?

Screen-Shot-2019-10-27-at-6.38.08-PM-1.jpeg
Click to expand...

Since both of those are narratives contrived by the left desperate to keep hold of their diminishing position globally they are irrelevant to me.

We are now in a period of unprecedented prosperity and Americans are enjoying their lives like no time in the last 20+ years.
 
Interesting that the DoJ now redacts material simply on the grounds that they are incriminating or politically embarrassing to chosen one.

From the article referenced above:

McCusker followed up in an email to OMB asking if this had gone through the Defense Department’s general counsel, indicating an early concern about the legality of these actions. When it released this email to the Center for Public Integrity, the Justice Department redacted this simple question from McCusker.

On Aug. 9, McCusker wrote to senior OMB officials, including Sandy and Duffey:

“As we discussed, as of 12 AUG I don’t think we can agree that the pause ‘will not preclude timely execution.’ We hope it won’t and will do all we can to execute once the policy decision is made, but can no longer make that declarative statement.”

The Pentagon’s warning: We’re running out of time.

The Justice Department chose to black this out when it released the email last month.
 
Last edited:
always covering up...always covering up...the DoJ has become a party to covering up chosen one's criminal abuse of office
 
My guess is the judge in charge of this case is going to have a few words to say about the motivations behind these redactions.
 
thethe said:
The attack on the embassy was the act of war but keep rooting for Iran because orange man bad.
Click to expand...

Except that Iran military wasn't involved and no deaths or serious injuries occurred during the attack. The protesters never actually breached the main compound. But sure, a totally rational response is to take out one of Iran's top military commanders in a clear act of war....

I swear, Trump could kill a baby live on national television and you would find a way to defend this clown.
 
Carp said:
Except that Iran military wasn't involved and no deaths or serious injuries occurred during the attack. The protesters never actually breached the main compound. But sure, a totally rational response is to take out one of Iran's top military commanders in a clear act of war....

I swear, Trump could kill a baby live on national television and you would find a way to defend this clown.
Click to expand...

Sweet...triviliazing what Iran has done and what they were doing at the time.

The only reason the attack in the embassy seemed innocent is because we have competent leadership now.
 
thethe said:
Sweet...triviliazing what Iran has done and what they were doing at the time.

The only reason the attack in the embassy seemed innocent is because we have competent leadership now.
Click to expand...

LOL stop. Our response to an attack on embassy which wasn't even carried out by their military and which no one was killed or seriously injured, was to kill one of their top military commanders in a drone strike at an airport. It is a CLEAR overreaction and further gaslit escalating tensions in the region. This move absolutely, 100% made Americans less safe.
 
Carp said:
LOL stop. Our response to an attack on embassy which wasn't even carried out by their military and which no one was killed or seriously injured, was to kill one of their top military commanders in a drone strike at an airport. It is a CLEAR overreaction and further gaslit escalating tensions in the region. This move absolutely, 100% made Americans less safe.
Click to expand...

Of course iran doesn't attack with their military. Where have you been?

This embassy was defended because we have competent leadership but iran was trying for another Benghazi which was coincidentally, no really that coincidental though, planned nu Suleimani.
 
thethe said:
The attack on the embassy was the act of war but keep rooting for Iran because orange man bad.
Click to expand...

I root for the Braves the Steelers and the Sixers.
Let's all hope the Braves have better success in 2020

Today it is reported Bolton ready to testify under oath.

How long has Persia existed --as long or longer than China ?

To your other point, yes the Orange man is bad --- and using that trying to make a point is lame
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top