WRONG. Trump already told reporters on the front lawn he doesn't know even know who Parnas is.
Impeachment
- Thread starter 57Brave
- Start date
WRONG. Trump already told reporters on the front lawn he doesn't know even know who Parnas is.
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
Didn't see it, but I know the highight is: "Trump knew exactly what was going on."
Also said Barr was part of the team.
Guiliani is the type of guy who would have a plethora of spelling errors in his text messages.
lol nunes so good. a month ago said he never had a call with Parnas. Now this:
Asked whether or not they spoke about former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, Nunes asserted that the first time he “heard the name Yovanovitch was not until this impeachment sham started.”
Asked whether or not they spoke about former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, Nunes asserted that the first time he “heard the name Yovanovitch was not until this impeachment sham started.”
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Oh please let Barr go to prison. I watched a documentary about doing life in prison and they make a good point, of you want to live a religious life it's far easier to do in prison than the outside world. If I was a judge and someone tried that "I found jesus bull**** or in any way tried to use religion to lessen their sentence I would give them the max and tell them I was doing it as a favor to then so they have more time to read the bible.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Just watching the interview now, going to bullet point what I find interesting
- I hope there are pictures of his shrine to Trump in his house. Really hope there is bodycam of the LEO finding it. Clearly this was just to throw people off his NeverTrumper trail.
- he says they were trying to collude with Poreshenko..... while the Mueller investigation was ongoing.... and the Quo in this case was to help Poreshenko win re-election. So out of Poreshenko and Zelensky we now know which one is the corrupt one. The one that took the deal. Zelensky needs to be behind bars. People on the streets dont get to claim they were strongarmed into crimes. It shouldnt work that way for corrupt Presidents either.
- what step are we in the Narcissists prayer right now?
-
- I hope there are pictures of his shrine to Trump in his house. Really hope there is bodycam of the LEO finding it. Clearly this was just to throw people off his NeverTrumper trail.
- he says they were trying to collude with Poreshenko..... while the Mueller investigation was ongoing.... and the Quo in this case was to help Poreshenko win re-election. So out of Poreshenko and Zelensky we now know which one is the corrupt one. The one that took the deal. Zelensky needs to be behind bars. People on the streets dont get to claim they were strongarmed into crimes. It shouldnt work that way for corrupt Presidents either.
- what step are we in the Narcissists prayer right now?
-
57Brave
Well-known member
Ezra Klein
@ezraklein
·
10h
This Parnas interview is incredibly damning.
But, then, it’s *all* been incredibly damning.
The problem here is not a lack of damning testimony, some of it from President Trump himself. It’s a lack of Republican senators who care about the country enough to do the right thing.
@ezraklein
·
10h
This Parnas interview is incredibly damning.
But, then, it’s *all* been incredibly damning.
The problem here is not a lack of damning testimony, some of it from President Trump himself. It’s a lack of Republican senators who care about the country enough to do the right thing.
Julio3000
<B>A Chip Off the Old Rock</B>
If you heard the same information as testimony under oath, backed up as it was by documents, you’d have to conclude that the scheme to damage Biden’s political chances, as has been broadly defined, is undeniable. Right? At this point it’s just a matter of whether or not you care.
It appears to me that there’s not *a* quid pro quo, but, like at least 4.
To Poroshenko: election assistance in exchange for dirt
To Lutsenko: removal of ambassador in exchange for dirt
To Firtash: dismissal of criminal case in exchange for dirt
To Zekenskyy: as discussed.
It also seems obvious that several parties are engaging in a network of legal relationships that are designed to hide potential corruption behind layers of attorney/client privilege.
It appears to me that there’s not *a* quid pro quo, but, like at least 4.
To Poroshenko: election assistance in exchange for dirt
To Lutsenko: removal of ambassador in exchange for dirt
To Firtash: dismissal of criminal case in exchange for dirt
To Zekenskyy: as discussed.
It also seems obvious that several parties are engaging in a network of legal relationships that are designed to hide potential corruption behind layers of attorney/client privilege.
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
The lesson seems obvious: If you are going to commit these sorts of crimes and abuses of power, you should commit many of them and be brazen about it.
I WANT NOTHING. I WANT NOTHING. I WANT NO QUID PRO QUO. TELL ZELENSKY TO DO THE RIGHT THING.
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
trademark infringement
Runnin
Well-known member
Perhaps Rachel Maddow had already negotiated what questions she would ask but there were several that didn't seem to come up. Maybe they will in the Part 2.
- Why did Parnas give Giulinani $500,000?
- What did Parnas expect to get out of the whole scheme?
- If Parnas is such an honest patriot who respects the law, why was he doing Trump's dirty work in the first place.
- Why did Parnas give Giulinani $500,000?
- What did Parnas expect to get out of the whole scheme?
- If Parnas is such an honest patriot who respects the law, why was he doing Trump's dirty work in the first place.