I harbor no ill will towards Bill. He definetly was a great source of braves info. It was just sad how personally he took it when someone disagreed with him. I think getting to know some of the players especially prospects made it hard for him to be anything close to objective about them. I would probably be the same if I got to know them.
He obviously put a lot of work in Scout forum. However, there were issues. He exaggerated the tightness of his connections with the org. As already mentioned, he overhyped prospects. Just read his book. It's easy to look back with hindsight and joke about Brandon Jones or baby Schuerholz, but be reasonable. If you take most samples of 10 prospects. Maybe one will achieve stardom. A couple could stick in the majors. Other will get hurt along the way, regress in development, decide to pursue another career path, etc. You name it.
Think of some of the names, that have passed through the system. Greatness was predicted for Komminsk, Terrell Wade, Mike Kelly, Chen, Lombard, Betemit, Marte, etc., etc. Nobody's suggesting that other clubs have greater success (all right, maybe some do) but to just pretend that all are destined for major league careers is just silly. Yeah, Georgia became more of hotbed, and names like Wainwright, McCann and Posey proved it, but it's not as if every kid is a potential peach, just because he grew up a Braves fan.
My point wasn't to intiate a bash Bill fest. I put my money where my mouth is and bought his book. Having read it, there was a natural assessment. He went too far with the "scouthead vs. stathead" non-debate. Many times, there were posts from me at Scout, mentioning that Schuerholz indicated in
his book that they use both approaches. So, these philosophies were not mutually exclusive. He basically only dealt with in in one chapter, and it was to capatilize on the Moneyball hype. Otherwise, there was no reason for anyone but a Braves fan to read that book.