Is Free Speech Under Attack in this Country?
- Thread starter sturg33
- Start date
It's incredibly ironic that the anti-intellectual crowd is 100% reliant on the very elites they loath to be able to spread their anti-intellectualism.
If your side is so smart, why can Parler only operate on the AWS platform? What kind of low end hacks wrote that code to be so tightly coupled to a single web service provider? It proves everyone calling folks on the right morons are right...they can't produce anything of value.
This whole argument is like a teenager rebelling against his parents and then getting mad when they turn off his credit card.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
The time for the right to complain about cancel culture was when Trump was championing cancel culture for anyone who didnt bow down and kiss his ass. Now that the funs over and they have to face the consequences of their actions we are supposed to feel sorry for them? Its not even the true believers I am the most mad at. Its the ones who come out now and talk about how crazy, incompetent, and unethical Trump was. Its too late now to get credit for that ****. I cant think of anything more urgent than letting people know the President is bordering on criminally insane.
Jaw
It's OVER 5,000!
So this is where we're at. Cajun bringing this weak whataboutism on the day Ron Paul was suspended without warning or explanation on Facebook. TDS is real.
sturg33
I
You have found yourself on the side of censorship at every opportunity
sturg33
I
"They're a private company, they can do whatever they want..."
"... except refuse to bake a cake, as there are external costs"
..."except pollute the air, as there are external costs"
..."except pay employees less than. $15/hr, as there are external costs"
Perhaps cajun can point out these hypocrites while he's at it
"... except refuse to bake a cake, as there are external costs"
..."except pollute the air, as there are external costs"
..."except pay employees less than. $15/hr, as there are external costs"
Perhaps cajun can point out these hypocrites while he's at it
striker42
Well-known member
I think she'd be surprised to learn that the first amendment actually likely protects the right to "spew disinformation," especially on political subjects.
sturg33
I
I thought the first amendment only protects warm and fuzzy words we all like
Jaw
It's OVER 5,000!
Cousin is gendered?
Jaw
It's OVER 5,000!
Thanks, I'm having a hard time keeping up. I learned in another thread that to associate something with it's most likely case is racism. Like, if I say "coon hunter" and you think of a rural white guy, then you're a racist. My tiny mind can only take so much. Fortunately I have some great software to help me.
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
word of the day: affinity
2a: sympathy marked by community of interest : KINSHIP
She has an affinity to him because of their common musical interests.
b(1): an attraction to or liking for something
people with an affinity to darkness
— Mark Twain
sturg has an affinity for the anti-democratic fascist cult
Last edited:
goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
we have already discussed your obsession with pronouns
just cause the house rules thing is making rounds again in conservative twitter and media again
doesn't mean it's worth talking about
i didn't make an argument at all. i didn't engage "your" topic at all. i talked about how it's funny you always bring the talking points from people you claim to not follow
that was all
just cause the house rules thing is making rounds again in conservative twitter and media again
doesn't mean it's worth talking about
i didn't make an argument at all. i didn't engage "your" topic at all. i talked about how it's funny you always bring the talking points from people you claim to not follow
that was all
Fun fact: these words aren’t banned from the House. This is only meant to apply to the text of the House rules document. It’s pointless, not fascist.