http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-18276864
It is just starting. Once China starts fighting back which they are doing (link below) the amount of attacks will increase.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-19099406
OK I should have exempted that province. Japan would be the better example overall of course.
But knowing the history of that province, the PRC propped up the Mujahidin. Sound familiar?
Its never there fault...its cool.
You don't have a point. You never do. You sound like a teenager that read a Ron Paul book and now just repeats everything the guy said. Then when every anybody counters your claim, you run an hide for a day and then come back with more tin foil/Ron Paul crap.
You claim these terrorists only commit violence because they are bombed or having family members that have been killed by bombs in the ME. (yet to find 1 example, it's just more rhetoric) This is an example of Al Queda trying to take over Somalia and forcing their Sharia Law onto the people and Kenya helping to stop it. Thus, Al Queda goes and bombs innocent people at a shopping mall.
The way that you justify terrorist acts (and yes the U.S. has done some terrible **** as well) is disgusting. I just hope there aren't too many young, dumb, impressionable young idiots like yourself that believe what they are reading on the sites you find this crap. If you would actually talk to people that have been over to some of these countries (or been there yourself) you could talk with a more knowledgeable opinion. Go have a conversation with someone that grew up in Israel....someone from Iraq. Go talk to some soldiers that have had there feet on the ground in Afghanistan and Iraq. Talk to them about what they believe. Or you can just read some more Ron Paul books about how the world only hates us because of bombings.
Question for the board... Let's take a look at our last two miserably failed wars... Iraq and Afghanistan
Afghanistan was because of revenge of 9/11 - to go and kill Osama. But if I recall correctly, it was the US CIA who trained Bin Laden, financed him, and armed him to help us fight Russia... Perhaps, with a little less intervention, we may not have had to deal with him 20 years later.
Iraq was because Sadamm was a mad man who was gonna unlease nukes on us. But if I recall correctly, it was the US government who put him in power, sent him money and weapons for him to fight Iran for us. Perhaps, with a little less intervention, we may not have had to deal with him 15 years later.
There are many many more examples. But I'll start with these two... Did the US interventionist foreign policy have anything to do with what later backfired and helped kill thousands of Americans?
And GF, before you start you 13 year old bitching, I'm traveling at the moment and may not be able to respond within minutes of your nonsense.
I never have a point? Just because you disagree with it doesn't mean I don't have a point... If I don't have a point, what the hell am I posting then?
I've wondered that a lot.
Yeah, bc quoting **** of Ron Paul fanboy sites makes you knowledgeable.
never seen reddit?
what the ****
never seen this site before. I'm not a reddit guy. Thanks