Legal/scotus thread

acesfull86 said:
I think Roberts said it well:

https://twitter.com/x/status/2039358415030415687
Click to expand...
Meh. Intent is quite obvious here. And there have been no shortage of 2nd amendment infringements despite the text quite clearly stating "shall not be infringed"

By letter of the text, they can get away with striking this down. But they understand the intent of the 14th and choosing to ignore that.

Unfortunately our congress will never fix this issue
 
coloradonewsline.com

Colorado appeals court orders resentencing of Tina Peters | Colorado Newsline

The Colorado Court of Appeals on Thursday upheld former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters’ conviction on felony charges related to a breach of her office’s elections equipment, but it ruled that a trial court had erred in imposing her nine-year prison sentence. Peters’ sentence, handed down in...
coloradonewsline.com coloradonewsline.com


Colorado Appeals Court orders convicted election fraudster Tina Peters to be resentenced citing reasoning for the sentence violated her first amendment rights. I guess Judges cant give extra time when convicted felons say "Yeah I did it and I will do it again". Nothing stopping her from getting sentenced to more time. That she would likely profit from her crime and be appointed to a position that would allow her to reoffend. If a pedophile is going to be given a job at a daycare when they get out I think thats a good reason to give them as much time as possible.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top