Let's Talk About Media

What will be amazing is when Alex Jones is back with a bigger audience next year under a new company.
 
[tw]1859978553665958359[/tw]

I know benefit of the doubt is understandably in short supply here, but I think it was just a poorly thought out article title. The article appears to be about the overwhelming evidence against the killer. Even the subheader is expressing that despite the controversy it was a simple case.
 
[tw]1859978553665958359[/tw]

Why are conservatives being such snowflakes about this? It was written ona legal blog talking about the trial. Took 3 seconds of googling to find it. Even just reading the subheader indicates it.

If the Lions whoop up on the Bears and a headline says the Bears never stood a chance I don't think anyone would take that as sympathy for the bears.

But snowflakes gonna snowflake
 
Or they corrected it because of losers on X being the failure trolls they are.

Why would MSNBC care about appeasing those folks? Is that generally what they do?

The simplest answer is what mqt said - it was a terribly written headline that didn’t match the article, so they made the headline better.
 
Why would MSNBC care about appeasing those folks? Is that generally what they do?

The simplest answer is what mqt said - it was a terribly written headline that didn’t match the article, so they made the headline better.

We live in an era where people only read headlines so there's probably some truth to that. But it still isn't that damning of a headline if you take any mount of effor.t

Yes MSNBC's owners care about optics. That's hardly anything new.
 
Back
Top