We've seen the entire routine a couple of times now. The next step is to have far left psych and sociology professional groups declare pedophilia not to to be bad, evil, or dangerous, and explain how the bigots who are not indulging their deviancy causes them physical harm.
Totally normal that the NYT is complaining about the lack of sex in a Disney movie
[Tw]1480962466746089478[/tw]
Did the rest of the article sympathize with child abusers, or did it continue to distinguish between child abusers and people attracted to children that know it’s wrong and don’t abuse them? I’m not signing up for USA Today to determine this myself.
Is there a defense in this article for people committing sexual acts with children?
Gonna quote myself from the other thread in hopes of finding an answer. I’m so terribly confused by this reaction from the Conservatives on the board. Is there a defense in this article for people committing sexual acts with children?
No. But that is not the issue It is the constant normalization of it... and building of sympathy for it. As jaw said, this is the early part of the cycle and you are falling for it
What makes you think that's what the article says. I'm assuming you're older than 10 years old. Until the last few years, the majority of disney films were love stories or had romance at their core, Cinderella, Snow White, Aristocats, Pocahontas, Lion King, Alladin, Little MErmaid, etc. Was child sex being sympathized in those films.
It's quite normal as a kid to see and hear tales of romance to couple with tales of adventure, friendship, etc.