Making a Murderer.
- Thread starter Prikichi
- Start date
Cops planted evidence to help case, but he's guilty.
NinersSBChamps
<B>Voted Worst Poster <br> 2015 (Co-Winner)</BR>20
Yes I have seen it and yes he's innocent. Police department planted evidence and had only one suspect the entire time. A missing person incident and not even questioning the roommate or ex-boyfriend?
Have you read the complete trial transcript? Dudes guilty
NBC and Discovery ID are airing a show in a few weeks where they report on all the evidence and such that wasn't included in Making a Murderer.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
Yeah, sorry, there's way too much **** to say he did it.
Especially the bit about the excused juror who said the vote when he left was 7 not guilty
You can Go read the trial transcripts too. That's a one sided, agenda driven movie that you are basing your opinion off of.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
Considering there were 240 hours or so of evidence, I have no desire to read the trial transcripts.
Sure they excluded a lot of evidence. Why wouldn't they?
Anyway best case scenario he should have not been convicted based on evidence that was not planted or coerced .
Tapate50
Well-known member
The confession they got from the child was a joke. Where they killed her (per the "confession") there was no blood. The Manitowac sherriff dept found the keys in plain view after the house had been searched by the neighboring county for 3 days? Cmon...they weren't even supposed to be on the site at all right? The police had 8 days of searching unsupervised by anyone to find something or plant it.
The car was right next to a car crusher that could have pretty much eliminated the evidence, but he didn't use it?
Im just on episode three though.
The car was right next to a car crusher that could have pretty much eliminated the evidence, but he didn't use it?
Im just on episode three though.
criminal activity also included threatening a female relative at gunpoint.
-- In the months leading up to Halbach's disappearance, Avery had called Auto Trader several times and always specifically requested Halbach to come out and take the photos.
-- Halbach had complained to her boss that she didn't want to go out to Avery's trailer anymore, because once when she came out, Avery was waiting for her wearing only a towel (this was excluded for being too inflammatory). Avery clearly had an obsession with Halbach.
-- On the day that Halbach went missing, Avery had called her three times, twice from a *67 number to hide his identity.
-- The bullet with Halbach's DNA on it came from Avery's gun, which always hung above his bed.
-- Avery had purchased handcuffs and leg irons like the ones Dassey described holding Halbach only three weeks before (Avery said he's purchased them for use with his girlfriend, Jodi, with whom he'd had a tumultuous relationship -- at one point, he was ordered by police to stay away from her for three days).
-- Here's the piece of evidence that was presented at trial but not in the series that I find most convincing: In Dassey's illegally obtained statement, Dassey stated that he helped Avery moved the RAV4 into the junkyard and that Avery had lifted the hood and removed the battery cable. Even if you believe that the blood in Halbach's car was planted by the cops (as I do), there was also non-blood DNA evidence on the hood latch. I don't believe the police would plant -- or know to plant -- that evidence.
-- In this phone conversation (transcript in link) with his mother (which is not entirely included in the docuseries), Brendan told his mother that he did it, that Steven made him do it, and that Steven had touched him (and others) inappropriately in the past.
-- There's no denying that it was unethical as hell for the investigator of Dassey's own attorney to elicit a confession out of Brendan, but the documentary suggests that the investigator peppered Brendan with leading questions and basically fed him the answers. From the full transcript, that is not the case at all. Brendan not only confessed, he gave a very detailed account of what happened. They had sex with Teresa on the bed, then they carried her out to the garage, where they cut her throat, and that's where Steven shot her five times with the .22 Brendan said he pulled from above his bed. Then they threw her in the fire. She begged for her life through the entire ordeal. Brendan even cut off some of her hair. Then they cleaned up with bleach and burned all the clothes in the bonfire
-- In the months leading up to Halbach's disappearance, Avery had called Auto Trader several times and always specifically requested Halbach to come out and take the photos.
-- Halbach had complained to her boss that she didn't want to go out to Avery's trailer anymore, because once when she came out, Avery was waiting for her wearing only a towel (this was excluded for being too inflammatory). Avery clearly had an obsession with Halbach.
-- On the day that Halbach went missing, Avery had called her three times, twice from a *67 number to hide his identity.
-- The bullet with Halbach's DNA on it came from Avery's gun, which always hung above his bed.
-- Avery had purchased handcuffs and leg irons like the ones Dassey described holding Halbach only three weeks before (Avery said he's purchased them for use with his girlfriend, Jodi, with whom he'd had a tumultuous relationship -- at one point, he was ordered by police to stay away from her for three days).
-- Here's the piece of evidence that was presented at trial but not in the series that I find most convincing: In Dassey's illegally obtained statement, Dassey stated that he helped Avery moved the RAV4 into the junkyard and that Avery had lifted the hood and removed the battery cable. Even if you believe that the blood in Halbach's car was planted by the cops (as I do), there was also non-blood DNA evidence on the hood latch. I don't believe the police would plant -- or know to plant -- that evidence.
-- In this phone conversation (transcript in link) with his mother (which is not entirely included in the docuseries), Brendan told his mother that he did it, that Steven made him do it, and that Steven had touched him (and others) inappropriately in the past.
-- There's no denying that it was unethical as hell for the investigator of Dassey's own attorney to elicit a confession out of Brendan, but the documentary suggests that the investigator peppered Brendan with leading questions and basically fed him the answers. From the full transcript, that is not the case at all. Brendan not only confessed, he gave a very detailed account of what happened. They had sex with Teresa on the bed, then they carried her out to the garage, where they cut her throat, and that's where Steven shot her five times with the .22 Brendan said he pulled from above his bed. Then they threw her in the fire. She begged for her life through the entire ordeal. Brendan even cut off some of her hair. Then they cleaned up with bleach and burned all the clothes in the bonfire
I agree 100%.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
I don't think he's competent enough to stand trial. I don't believe he really knew he was able to understand what was going on.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
Without looking at law, he was 16 IIRC and in some states if you are charged for a capital offense over a certain age you're automatically tried as an adult.
Seriously theinterview with the cops and him is one of the most painful things I've ever watched.
bravesnumberone
Well-known member
There's no way Avery should ever have been convicted. And what they did to his nephew was abhorrent.
How is this relevant?
This is not true. He requested 'that girl who was out here before'...which could suggest he wanted her sent out specifically to murder her for some unknown motive, or it could mean he wanted a good picture taken of his vehicle.
Also not true. The only thing she did was tell a coworker when she got back about him answering the door in a towel and said 'ew'. She knew exactly where she was going that day, so why would she have gone if she never wanted to go back? And since when is wearing the door in a towel more than just weird? It's now somehow a sign the guy wanted to kill her?
And again, she knew exactly where she was going. Avery had called Auto Trader to set up the visit (leaving a paper trail), and she told coworkers exactly where she was going. And she obviously drove there. I have no idea why he dialed *67, but it pretty clearly wasn't to hide where she was going.
How is this different from Steven's DNA being found on the car key, or from the blood found in her car? If the police are capable of planting that stuff, and it seems pretty clear they did, how is it a stretch to suggest they found that bullet and planted DNA on it? And it somehow had her DNA but no blood?
Please tell me you've seen a picture of these 'handcuffs and leg irons'. Here they are:
So yes, I'm sure he handcuffed her and secured her in leg irons specifically designed for sex that are easy-release. Do you realize how easy it is for a person to get out of these? And there is zero evidence suggesting they were involved in anything, including a lack of any DNA from Halbach on them.
You believe they planted actual blood in her car, but didn't plant that bit of evidence? And if you believe the cops planted the keys (and I think most do), then they'd already shown they had the ability to plant non-blood DNA. I honestly have no idea how this is some bit of compelling evidence if you're willing to throw things like the keys and blood out.
Brendan said a lot of things in those phone calls. The documentary even played the tape of him telling his mom he did it. After being told to do so by his own attorney. And he eventually, in the same call, said he didn't do it. He said a whole bunch of things, all of them contradictory, and pretty clearly had no idea what actually happened. I don't know why anyone would view anything Brendan ever said as trustworthy.
So they slit her throat and shot her five times in that cluttered garage and somehow managed to clean up every single bit of blood and DNA in that garage (but not all of Steven's DNA). And then they just left her keys and a bullet sitting there. And they put her in the back of her own car parked outside only to later drag her to the backyard a few feet away. And then they managed to create a bonfire capable of completely burning a body, stoking it for 16 hours to create enough prolonged heat. And then they moved some of the bones to other locations but left a majority still sitting in that burn pit. They then cleaned all of her blood out of the back of her car but didn't clean Steven's blood, moved it onto his own property, and propped a few branches on top of it instead of crushing it. Steven did all of this to someone he didn't really know at the same time he was set to receive a massive settlement that would completely set him for life.
I find that story far more unbelievable than the story that the police planted the blood, key, bullet, and hood latch DNA and moved the bones and car onto his property for the clear motive of saving their careers and avoiding having to pay Steven Avery for the rest of their lives. I just do.
Part of Dassey's confession was telling police that Avery used the gun "above his bed," the same one that the police linked to the murder. Dassey also talked about how Avery opened up the car hood to disable the battery cables....which lines up perfectly with the evidence. So, while Dassey said a lot of things; how did he specifically name two things that line up 100% with the evidence?
Avery gave Auto Trader a fake name and used his sisters phone number when tricking Halbach to come out to his property.
How did the County plant his sweat in the hood?
Her phone, camera, and PDA were found 20 feet from Avers door.
Halbachs bones were in the firepit intertwined with the steel belts left over from the car tires Avery threw in the fire to burn. (also described by Dassey)
Avery called Halback 3x that day, the first 2 using *67. Later that day he called without *67 and tried to use that as his alibi (that she never showed up). But, we all know she showed up.
The bullet found in the garage was fired by Avery gun. (his gun was in locker on 11/6) THus, the bullet had to be fired before 11/6, so how did they plant that evidence 4 months later?
Avery gave Auto Trader a fake name and used his sisters phone number when tricking Halbach to come out to his property.
How did the County plant his sweat in the hood?
Her phone, camera, and PDA were found 20 feet from Avers door.
Halbachs bones were in the firepit intertwined with the steel belts left over from the car tires Avery threw in the fire to burn. (also described by Dassey)
Avery called Halback 3x that day, the first 2 using *67. Later that day he called without *67 and tried to use that as his alibi (that she never showed up). But, we all know she showed up.
The bullet found in the garage was fired by Avery gun. (his gun was in locker on 11/6) THus, the bullet had to be fired before 11/6, so how did they plant that evidence 4 months later?
This is a lot to go through, but where did you find all this information? In regard to his alibi specifically, when did he claim she never showed up? Because he was interviewed right after she was reported missing and said she was there. So when did he claim otherwise?
I believe most of the information was from the NY Daily News. You can probably google something like "Why Avery is guilty"
The former prosecutor has also provided a lot of this information, I believe.