i'm shocked you don't understand what a karen is
you know he's totally a karen. can you imagine serving that guy at a restaurant? probably a nightmare that tips 5%.
always gotta chime in to defend the billionaires he's subservient to tho.
i'm shocked you don't understand what a karen is
I don't really see the point in taking a side between two groups of wealthy people arguing over how to split up a bunch of money.
I know its very deadspin chic to crap on ownership and any other authority, but I think its probably not one of the great moral dilemmas of our society or particularly important.
I don't really see the point in taking a side between two groups of wealthy people arguing over how to split up a bunch of money.
I know its very deadspin chic to crap on ownership and any other authority, but I think its probably not one of the great moral dilemmas of our society or particularly important.
you know he's totally a karen. can you imagine serving that guy at a restaurant? probably a nightmare that tips 5%.
always gotta chime in to defend the billionaires he's subservient to tho.
Considering the players represent the labor side of the argument, and the majority of Americans are also on the labor side of the economy, I would expect the general population to be on the side of players. It's not the case for some reason though...the millionaire baseball player is seen as greedy, while the billionaire owner is somehow the victim.
I'll never understand why folks insist on siding with the rich old white guy, but that oddity is essentially what dominates US ideology. How the billionaire executive gets to play the victim card in this country will always baffle me. "Waaahhh, the plebs are coming after more of my crumbs....wwwaaaahhhhh".
I think it would help the players a lot if some of these individual players just shut up about it. Snell and Harper came out and came across as moronic dbags. Players union should just tell players to give a standard canned response whenever it's brought up. People's perception is more driven by the way things are presented in the media rather than rational thought.
Considering the players represent the labor side of the argument, and the majority of Americans are also on the labor side of the economy, I would expect the general population to be on the side of players. It's not the case for some reason though...the millionaire baseball player is seen as greedy, while the billionaire owner is somehow the victim.
I'll never understand why folks insist on siding with the rich old white guy, but that oddity is essentially what dominates US ideology. How the billionaire executive gets to play the victim card in this country will always baffle me. "Waaahhh, the plebs are coming after more of my crumbs....wwwaaaahhhhh".
I miss baseball
Considering the players represent the labor side of the argument, and the majority of Americans are also on the labor side of the economy, I would expect the general population to be on the side of players. It's not the case for some reason though...the millionaire baseball player is seen as greedy, while the billionaire owner is somehow the victim.
I'll never understand why folks insist on siding with the rich old white guy, but that oddity is essentially what dominates US ideology. How the billionaire executive gets to play the victim card in this country will always baffle me. "Waaahhh, the plebs are coming after more of my crumbs....wwwaaaahhhhh".
We will cut all of their heads off when the people rise, comrade.
We will cut all of their heads off when the people rise, comrade.