The decision by the Illinois Supreme court was correct because the prosecution broke their word.
The guy is still a douchebag for being a fraud.
more lawfare
- Thread starter nsacpi
- Start date
The decision by the Illinois Supreme court was correct because the prosecution broke their word.
The guy is still a douchebag for being a fraud.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
I dont think the deal should have held up. It was an obviously corrupt deal by someone who should have recused themself. I do take issue with this not being treated the same as other people. Just the other day a cop shot himself in the leg and made a false call saying he was shot at. There was a big response and he was just suspended not arrested.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Lol
E Jean Carrol
-Has accused 7 other men of rape/sexually assault.
-Wrote on Facebook that her 2 favorite shows were The Apprentice and Law & Order. Yes, one of her favorite shows was one hosted by her supposed rapist.
-Claimed that Trump raped her right in the middle of Bergdoff Goodman’s Department Store dressing room in NYC with no witnesses that see him there in the store.
-Her story was IDENTICAL to a Law & Order episode right down to a rape happening in a dressing room at Bergdoff.
First story:
-Said initially that she was raped in 1994 and she wore the dress she was raped in on national magazine. Here's the cover.
She even said that fluids were still on the dress (yuck). The problem is that the designer of the dress said that the dress wasn't available yet in 1994. Oops!
The story changed. No mention of the dress. This second story is that she can't provide a date, month, or year (her friends say 1996) that this fantastical story happened, which intentionally prevents Trump from establishing an alibi.
Trump's team was blocked from showing the jury the dress story in court.
No matter what happens in court I can say with a straight face this rape/sexual assault didn't happen.
-Has accused 7 other men of rape/sexually assault.
-Wrote on Facebook that her 2 favorite shows were The Apprentice and Law & Order. Yes, one of her favorite shows was one hosted by her supposed rapist.
-Claimed that Trump raped her right in the middle of Bergdoff Goodman’s Department Store dressing room in NYC with no witnesses that see him there in the store.
-Her story was IDENTICAL to a Law & Order episode right down to a rape happening in a dressing room at Bergdoff.
First story:
-Said initially that she was raped in 1994 and she wore the dress she was raped in on national magazine. Here's the cover.
She even said that fluids were still on the dress (yuck). The problem is that the designer of the dress said that the dress wasn't available yet in 1994. Oops!
The story changed. No mention of the dress. This second story is that she can't provide a date, month, or year (her friends say 1996) that this fantastical story happened, which intentionally prevents Trump from establishing an alibi.
Trump's team was blocked from showing the jury the dress story in court.
No matter what happens in court I can say with a straight face this rape/sexual assault didn't happen.
Last edited by a moderator:
Those are facts that the judges and jury decided weren't important.
Everything I have posted there is true. Look it up. I've posted most of ths here before.
Show me any other person who has changed their story and won a lawsuit.
I'll wait.
Last edited by a moderator:
E Jean Carrol
-Has accused 7 other men of rape/sexually assault.
-Wrote on Facebook that her 2 favorite shows were The Apprentice and Law & Order. Yes, one of her favorite shows was one hosted by her supposed rapist.
-Claimed that Trump raped her right in the middle of Bergdoff Goodman’s Department Store dressing room in NYC with no witnesses that see him there in the store.
-Her story was IDENTICAL to a Law & Order episode right down to a rape happening in a dressing room at Bergdoff.
First story:
-Said initially that she was raped in 1994 and she wore the dress she was raped in on national magazine. Here's the cover.
She even said that fluids were still on the dress (yuck). The problem is that the designer of the dress said that the dress wasn't available yet in 1994. Oops!
The story changed. No mention of the dress. This second story is that she can't provide a date, month, or year (her friends say 1996) that this fantastical story happened, which intentionally prevents Trump from establishing an alibi.
Trump's team was blocked from showing the jury the dress story in court.
No matter what happens in court I can say with a straight face this rape/sexual assault didn't happen.
I’m not super interested in the Trump-Carroll case, but I’ve noticed there’s a strange tendency to both be completely bought into the idea that Epstein and Diddy were having sex trafficking parties with all of Hollywood and completely adamant that prominent celebrities like Trump could never have done such an awful thing. Why is that? Is it credible to claim Diddy or Epstein’s parties featured sexual assault or human trafficking? If so, why is it suddenly no longer credible to claim someone in that circle must be innocent?
Are there credibility issues with witnesses in the Diddy or Epstein case like here?
As i said her have you seen anybody alter their story and win a case?
Do you know any women who have accused 7 different men of rape/sexual assault?
Show me where I'm wrong here.
Last edited by a moderator:
Again, I’m just not interested enough in this to care to look up the details. I won’t be going around calling Trump a rapist or advocating for him to be thrown in prison. I just find that related trend a bit curious.
Maybe it was all a big misunderstanding and Trump just thought he was sleeping with his wife Marla all these years! Poor Donald.