Typical . Deflect the topic when the heat is on.
Movie Thread
- Thread starter zitothebrave
- Start date
Typical . Deflect the topic when the heat is on.
jpx7
Very Flirtatious, but Doubts What Love Is.
Fair enough. It resonated with me, and I found it overall successful as a film, on the terms it set for itself; nonetheless, as I've said I can understand/appreciate how it's potentially alienating or unaffecting to many viewers. (On the other hand, I think Days of Heaven is unimpeachably great.)
But I also personally put a premium on formal experimentation—not just in films but across all media—so I'm very willing to give credit when an author attempts something daring or audacious, even if they don't entirely stick the landing. That's not to say I don't like conventionally-structured films/texts, especially when they're very well-crafted; it's just that—given two similarly flawed texts—I'm going to give more credit to the one that's ****ing around with its medium.
Funny that you have grown to like X3 then, seeing as they did the EXACT same thing with Halle Berry. That's just one of several reasons why I hate X3. They competely ruined the franchise for me with that movie.
But she was a real xmen. Mystique has always been a villain. They force this relationship with Charles to make her important since it's Lawrence.
And at least Wolverine was there also.
I really love X3 because of Beast. Beast was my favorite in the tv show and Grammar was awesome as Hank McCoy. He's also the one that neutralized Magneto.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
Valid concern.
Star Power always creates issues in comic book adaptations.
X3 is an abomination. It's not because of Storm. It's because of the abortion of the Phoenix and the horrific ending. To the point they nuked X3 from ever happening.
XMen and X2 got a lot right.
jpx7
Very Flirtatious, but Doubts What Love Is.
Hard for me to argue, though, when the star is Jennifer Lawrence.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
FIFY
Your fetishes continue to weird me out.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
`You think that women in skin tight body suit is a weird fetish? Heh.
That moment when someone thinks your lightest fetish is weird.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
SAV has the fetish taste of a 12 year old. He admitted the only porn he likes is 1 on 1 P in the V
P IN the V??
Damn, what a perv. I only accept P around the V, with possible light grazing. And a condom, of course.
jpx7
Very Flirtatious, but Doubts What Love Is.
I usually only accept the following P/V relationships:
sin[SUP]2[/SUP] P + sin[SUP]2[/SUP] V = cos[SUP]2[/SUP] P + cos[SUP]2[/SUP] V
tan V = cot P
tan V = cot P
But sometimes you want variety:
P[SUB]1[/SUB]V[sub]1[/sub]=P[sub]2[/sub]V[sub]2[/sub]
And sometimes you get into the really nasty stuff:
PV=nRT
Not at all. It's your fetish for Mystique.
That's definitely never good.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
It's reshoots because of dialogue basically. They writer and director weren't on the same page or something and it veered way off course.
That's still not good.