jpx7
Very Flirtatious, but Doubts What Love Is.
Everyone I know thought it would win for that reason. Same reason Crash won and crash wasn't a great movie.
I can't speak for 12 Years a Slave, not having seen it, but Crash was—by far—one of the worst films to win an Oscar in the last thirty years. It's especially frustrating because—while Crash, on purely its own merits, is a white-guilt-effacing, pat-me-on-the-back-for-having-met-a-minority piece of ****—each of the other four films nominated for Best Picture that year, and particularly Brokeback Mountain, but also Capote and Good Night, and Good Luck, were miles more deserving.
Meanwhile, Scorsese's only Oscar win came for The Departed, which—while a fine film, all around—isn't even amongst his best ten films; and really, as far as I'm concerned, no film that year (2006) deserved a Best Picture award, while the following year there were three or four deserving pictures, including There Will Be Blood (which was robbed), No Country for Old Men (which was good, but—again—was neither one of the Coens' best nor better than There Will Be Blood), The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford (which I also preferred to No Country for Old Men, but which wasn't even nominated), and Michael Clayton (a surprisingly good, underrated little drama).
And in general, the broad politics of these awards—and I don't just mean the "political correctness" or social advocacy angles—are always fairly annoying. For instance: Return of the King winning a "trilogy" award for all three films, when it was pretty clearly the weakest of the three in many regards.