NBA Thread

his offense has definitely grown.
think giles called him terrible a bit ago.

People are making too many assessments based on a stat sheet around these parts. Stat sheets are misleading on younger players when predicting growth.
 
People are making too many assessments based on a stat sheet around these parts. Stat sheets are misleading on younger players when predicting growth.

Saying someone is terrible now doesn't necessarily mean they will be terrible for their entire career. That's something you can't wrap your head around with Adams either (not saying he's terrible)

Noel needs a lot of help to even sniff any max player consideration.
 
Saying someone is terrible now doesn't necessarily mean they will be terrible for their entire career. That's something you can't wrap your head around with Adams either (not saying he's terrible)

Noel needs a lot of help to even sniff any max player consideration.

Noel needs to make some improvements on offense (which he is already starting to do) to get max. His defense is already at max player level.
 
Which should indicate a good thing right since the best offensive player in basketball really hasn't played with him yet right?

I would hope that would mean his usage rate would drop from 40% which would put his numbers back in line with his career rates.
 
thethe, you really think Samuel Dalembert should have been a max player?

To compare the two, Noel is much skinnier/weaker than Dalembert but still at a young age where you hope he gets better. Though there are plenty of others with the same offensive liabilities that never got better.

Right now, he's basically Dalembert. Slightly better defensively, somehow worse offensively. Noel is just a pathetic offensive player. He's not a great rebounder (mainly bc he's non existent as an offensive rebounder).
 
Never said I woudl do it but I would understand why a team would have depending on the supporting cash and their contract situations. Didn't Dalambert get one huge contract anyway?

He got 60 mil for 6 years but that wasn't close to a max deal back in 2006.
 
What about Theo Ratliff? Though Ratliff was miles ahead of him on the offensive side. Would you have paid him max deal?
 
thethe, you really think Samuel Dalembert should have been a max player?

To compare the two, Noel is much skinnier/weaker than Dalembert but still at a young age where you hope he gets better. Though there are plenty of others with the same offensive liabilities that never got better.

Right now, he's basically Dalembert. Slightly better defensively, somehow worse offensively. Noel is just a pathetic offensive player. He's not a great rebounder (mainly bc he's non existent as an offensive rebounder).

Game was a lot different when Ratliff played. It was less of the pace and space so the defenses weren't as stretched. Therefore, your rim protection wasn't as dependent on one man as it is now. If Ratliff played in today's game I think there would be teams that would consider it for sure.

Also, I didn't say that Noel is a max player right now.
 
I would hope that would mean his usage rate would drop from 40% which would put his numbers back in line with his career rates.

Oh it better. But, imagine a PnR with Kanter/Adams with KD/Morrow/Ibaka on the wings. That is some serious space. Morrow has been great for the Thunder (as predicted!)
 
What about Theo Ratliff? Though Ratliff was miles ahead of him on the offensive side. Would you have paid him max deal?

Good call on Ratliff.......I see that and Larry Sanders. If he adds a ton of weight and develops some offensive moves or a shot at all, maybe he turns in to a Tyson Chandler, maybe.
 
Game was a lot different when Ratliff played. It was less of the pace and space so the defenses weren't as stretched. Therefore, your rim protection wasn't as dependent on one man as it is now. If Ratliff played in today's game I think there would be teams that would consider it for sure.

Also, I didn't say that Noel is a max player right now.

And Ratliff was still a much better shot blocker.
 
Back
Top