Neverending **** the Police thread.





Some scary stuff here. This is a story with bodycam footage with analysis from a former cop. Police respond to two 911 calls/hangups. Later proven that they did not come from this home. Come to his home with mouth their lights on, knock on his door and dont announce themself in the middle of the night. The guy cracks his door open and the cops say "what's going on Mark" and "come on out Mark". This is key as they claimed they never had the chance to announce themself. Either of those statements could have been started by saying "police". The victim asks if they have a gun and then says "I have one too". One cop backs up draws his weapon and says "what's that Mark" then fired 8 bullets into the closed front door almost hitting a cop right in front of him. He hits the deck and probably came very close to a head shot. Police claim the victim pointed a gun at them but no gun was found..... the chief arrives on scene and immediately tells the cop he did the right thing. The victim is then arrested for "assaulting the police officers".......
 
Slavery gave America a fear of black people and a taste for violent punishment. Both still define our criminal-justice system.

By Bryan Stevenson
AUG. 14, 2019

18mag-justice-e-03-master675-v4.jpg


Prisoners from Ferguson Prison of Huntsville, Tx. picking cotton in 1968. Danny Lyon/Magnum Photos

Anything that challenged the racial hierarchy could be seen as a crime, punished either by the law or by the lynchings that stretched from Mississippi to Minnesota. In 1916, Anthony Crawford was lynched in South Carolina for being successful enough to refuse a low price for his cotton. In 1933, Elizabeth Lawrence was lynched near Birmingham for daring to chastise white children who were throwing rocks at her.
 
Last edited:
https://reason.com/2019/08/26/secret-memos-show-the-government-has-been-lying-about-backpage/



Apparently everything we have heard about backpage.com has been fake news. Federal prosecutors decided to target them in 2012 and now we have memos from them lamenting that the company was genuinely trying to keep underage girls off their adult section. Not only did they cooperate with law enforcement, unlike other similar sites, they were proactive in trying to stop the illegal activity. Requiring credit cards for ads made it easy for LE to track down suspects but after a campaign against backpage credit card companies refused them service so they had to rely on other forms of payment like bitcoin. Prosecutors then used these other forms of payments to charge them with money laundering.
 
https://losangeles.cbslocal.com/201...-lapd-officer-in-corona-costco-files-lawsuit/





I don't remember where I posted this story originally but this is the off duty LAPD cop who shoots a retarded man and his parents in a Costco after being "hit or pushed" by the retarded man while standing in a line for free samples. This apparently wasn't a reactionary shooting as there was time for the parents to beg for their for their sons life before he shot. I cant imagine any scenario where a non cop opens fire in a crowded supermarket hitting 2 innocent people behind his intended target is not immediately arrested and charged. There is reported to be video of the shooting spree but police wont release it. Which guarantees that whatever it shows is bad for ththe cop. If he was right here they would release it ASAP.
 
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/08/photoshop-tattoos-oregon/596482/



Cops in Portland photoshop a picture to make someone look more like their suspect...... when the officer responsible was asked about he said they did it all the time and that he learned of the tactic through "on the job training by his supervisors. He has said he has used it many times in the past and they dont include that they photoshopped a picture in any reports. Not gonna hold my breath on the DoJ or FBI giving a **** but this should be huge news.
 
https://www.foxnews.com/us/ex-dalla...by-sexting-police-partner-prosecutors-say.amp



https://abcnews.go.com/US/dallas-police-officer-amber-guyger-set-trial-killing/story?id=65782786



Amber Guyger trial is underway. She claims self defense... from an unarmed man.... in his apartment...... turns out she was sexting a male coworker on her way to the wrong apartment. Defense says the prosecutor are "turning an innocent mistake into an evil act". She is eligible for the death penalty. I wish prosecutors would dangle that over her head as leverage to get her to plead like they would if Botham had made the same innocent mistake. The judge is going to give her the minimum and say this is a tragedy for everyone bull****.
 
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...force-in-protection?__twitter_impression=true


Judge is allowing the jury to consider self defense by Guyger when she murdered a man eating ice cream in his apartment she had no right to be in. This **** is all so corrupt. The cunt only spent 30 minutes in jail for ****ing murder. Shouldn't the jail officials be held accountable? Could you imagine the backlash if someone kills a cop and they spent 30 minutes in jail to be processed and then released?
 




And the bitch is convicted with little deliberation. Now lets hopefully she gets the death penalty just like Botham would have got if he murdered a cop.
 
https://www.wfaa.com/article/news/s...rial/287-c1afb7ab-255c-444f-ac25-e3ba14b2f337




Convicted murderer Amber Guyger's racist and violent texts and social media posts. Kind of lose all sympathy when she was posting things like "people are ungrateful, they never thank me for not having the patience to kill people"




Other interesting texts between Guyger and her boyfriend on the force they complain about black officers specifically saying they operate differently. Would really like some kind of explanation for that.
 
https://thefreethoughtproject.com/t...earch-mans-anal-cavity-over-window-tint-stop/




Cops pull over a car allegedly for illegal window tmnt and proceed to immediately handcuff the occupants, pull the passenger out of the car and start fondling his genitals. Je objects so they beat the **** out of him and then rape/sodomize him. Nothing illegal was found. The cops were cleared of any criminal wrongdoing and are on paid suspension. Now the taxpayers will be on the hook. This is one reason I will always support lower taxes or less money given to the government. I would rather burn money than give it to government. When they have an unlimited supply of money it has literally no effect when they get sued.
 
cajunrevenge said:
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...force-in-protection?__twitter_impression=true


Judge is allowing the jury to consider self defense by Guyger when she murdered a man eating ice cream in his apartment she had no right to be in. This **** is all so corrupt. The cunt only spent 30 minutes in jail for ****ing murder. Shouldn't the jail officials be held accountable? Could you imagine the backlash if someone kills a cop and they spent 30 minutes in jail to be processed and then released?
Click to expand...

I've not followed this case super close but I think allowing the jury to consider self-defense was the right choice. From what I understand, she was essentially arguing mistake as a defense. If you make a reasonable mistake of fact and if it wouldn't have been a crime if the facts had been as you believed them, it isn't a crime. For example, suppose your best friend wants to play a prank on you, uses a spare key, and sneaks into your house at night. You wake up to the sound of someone in your house and you shoot and kill him thinking he's someone who broke in, you're not guilty of murder. Believing your friend is a criminal who broke in is a reasonable mistake of fact. In this example the jury would need to be instructed on the castle doctrine so they can determine if the killing was excused after determining the mistake was reasonable.

In this case, the jury had to decide if her "mistake" about apartments was reasonable. If it was, then they'd have to decide on self-defense (I think they instructed castle doctrine). The jury rightly decided the mistake was not reasonable and so the self-defense instruction was irrelevant.


cajunrevenge said:




And the bitch is convicted with little deliberation. Now lets hopefully she gets the death penalty just like Botham would have got if he murdered a cop.
Click to expand...


This was never going to be a death penalty or even a life in prison case. You generally need some aggravating factors to get up to that level. Stuff like this being a robbery attempt by her, there being a long running and escalating dispute between them, etc. But there's no evidence of any of those factors. So this isn't really a death penalty or even life in prison case.
 
For the record, I think her sentence was ridiculously light. She likely got that light of a sentence by virtue of being a cop. I'd have given her 30 years.
 
How far back in time does premeditated murder have to go? She testified that she drew her gun before going in and went in with the intention to kill anyone in there. It wasnt her just walking into her apartment and seeing a big black man and shooting him. She actively made a decision to put herself in perceived danger. I think she shot him thinking she would get 6 weeks of paid vacation as departments do for officers involved in shootings. He had a very distinctive red doormat outside his door. Guyger had a very large table in her apartment that should have given her a clue. If you ever go into a strangers home there is almost always a distinctive smell as well. Her social media posts show a clear bias against black people and a tendency towards violence. She even talked **** about black officers.



I think this is a clear case of shooting first and asking questions later. My frustration with the case is that we all know Botham would have been treated like a thug if he did this to her. I do believe this would be a death penalty case if he did this to her and that courtroom would be packed with cops supporting Botham be put to death. She ended up getting 10 years which will only be 5 and she will have a job waiting or her when she gets out from one of her cop buddies.



What do you think about the Texas Ranger lead investigator saying he didnt see a crime here. If he had his way this trial never would have happened. Do you think he should be removed from investigating police officers?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top