zbhargrove
Well-known member
months? sure.
Dickey's been a bargain for how he's pitched, honestly.
months? sure.
Camargo has a mediocre .776 OPS due do a completely unsustainable .397 BABIP. He is not an everyday player at 3b for a team with the goal of being a fringe WC contender in 2018.
Pozzies need to stop thinking these players are more than they are just because they play for the Braves. Camargo is a utility player on a good team, or a starting SS on a bad team. That's what he is, and no amount of homerism changes that fact.
The Braves need to fix 3b this off season. It's time to get a 2+ win guy over there and stop with these silly experiments with below average players. The resources are there, and the need has clearly been present for years with no real solution currently in the organization.
Please give us the source of your "fact." I suspect this is just your latest example of forming a conclusion, then trying to cherry pick "facts" that support it. How very Democratic of you.
Several folks have already explained it. His .400 BABIP is unsustainable. When it drops into the .300 range his OPS will be well under .700.
It isn't overly complicated.
What have I been wrong about? Kemp? Adams? Sale trade? Newcomb? Braves overall record? What?
It's sad that in 2017 people don't understand the effect of a 400 BABIP and why it's not sustainable.
It's sad that in 2017 people don't understand the effect of a 400 BABIP and why it's not sustainable.
First of all, the Braves should be an 80-85 win team next year. There is no reason to sell assets under control for next year. The window is opening. The time for unloading everyone is over.
If the Braves were to sell off all expiring assets, they will be replaced with internal options who are still good enough that the Braves won't be getting a Top 5 pick anyways. Worst case scenario is they trade BP then promote Albies, or trade Garcia and "see what they have" with Allard or Soroka.
Keeping those guys in place just to prevent them from needlessly starting the clocks of the top prospects is worth more than they will get in return.
Unless a package of vets gets a solid prospect back, keep them all. The Braves don't need more fringe prospects, and they won't make themselves bad enough to get a Top 5 pick anyways.
They should have 35 million plus in salary coming off including Phillips, J. Johnson, and Dickey's hopefully declined option.
First of all, the Braves should be an 80-85 win team next year. There is no reason to sell assets under control for next year. The window is opening. The time for unloading everyone is over.
If the Braves were to sell off all expiring assets, they will be replaced with internal options who are still good enough that the Braves won't be getting a Top 5 pick anyways. Worst case scenario is they trade BP then promote Albies, or trade Garcia and "see what they have" with Allard or Soroka.
Keeping those guys in place just to prevent them from needlessly starting the clocks of the top prospects is worth more than they will get in return.
Unless a package of vets gets a solid prospect back, keep them all. The Braves don't need more fringe prospects, and they won't make themselves bad enough to get a Top 5 pick anyways.
How about adams to the Yankees for A 11-15 ranked fv 50 guy and taking chase Hendley's contract?
Solarte would be pretty budget friendly and he's at least young and the options are in the team's favor. But I can only imagine that the Padres would want something much more valuable than the Marlins would want for Prado.
I personally almost don't see the point in Prado. He's 33 and fairly expensive at 13.5 m in 2018 and 15 m in 2019. He's been a better player than Solarte at points in his career but he's older and more expensive. In some respects though he would fit the Braves dual timeline. He can probably be acquired for less than a premium prospect and he comes off the payroll at the same time as Kemp, which seems to be the real point at which the Braves next run should start.
Joel Sherman wrote a column saying the Tigers should put Michael Fulmer on the block now since they're heading towards a rebuild. If we are intent on trading for a controlled starter in the next year or so, I wouldn't be opposed to him being the guy. He's under control through 2022.
Johnson is on the books through 2018.
Jim Johnson rhp
2 years/$10M (2017-18)
2 years/$10M (2017-18)
signed extension with Atlanta 10/12/16
$1M signing bonus
17:$4.5M, 18:$4.5M
performance bonuses: $0.25M each for 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 games finished
1 year/$2.5M (2016)
signed by Atlanta as a free agent 11/30/15
performance bonuses: $70,000 each for 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 games. $75,000 each for 25, 30, 35, 40 games finished. $0.15M each for 45, 50, 55, 60 GF
1 year/$1.6M (2015)
signed by Atlanta as a free agent 12/3/14
may earn additional $0.9M in performance bonuses
acquired by LA Dodgers in trade from Atlanta 7/30/15 with Dodgers responsible for $577,049 remaining in 2015 salary
DFA and refused assignment, electing free agency 10/14/15
1 year/$10M (2014)
signed by Oakland 1/16/14 (avoided arbitration)
DFA by Oakland 7/24/14, released 8/1/14
signed by Detroit as a free agent 8/5/14 (minor-league contract)
contract selected by Detroit 8/17/14
1 year/$6.5M (2013)
re-signed by Baltimore 2/8/13 (avoided arbitration, $7.1M-$5.7M)
performance bonuses: $25,000 each for 50, 55 games finished
acquired by Oakland in trade from Baltimore 12/2/13
1 year/$2.625M (2012)
re-signed by Baltimore 1/16/12 (avoided arbitration)
1 year/$0.975M (2011)
re-signed by Baltimore 1/18/11 (avoided arbitration)
1 year/$0.44M (2010)
re-signed by Baltimore 3/9/10
1 year/$0.42M (2009)
re-signed by Baltimore 3/8/09
1 year/$0.39M (2008)
re-signed by Baltimore 1/22/08 (split contract, $62,500 in minors)
award bonuses: $25,000 each for All Star, Rookie of Year
1 year (2007)
re-signed by Baltimore 2/07
1 year (2006)
contract purchased by Baltimore 11/05
drafted by Baltimore 2001 (5-143) (Union-Endicott HS, NY)
agent: Moye Sports
ML service: 8.161
Joel Sherman wrote a column saying the Tigers should put Michael Fulmer on the block now since they're heading towards a rebuild. If we are intent on trading for a controlled starter in the next year or so, I wouldn't be opposed to him being the guy. He's under control through 2022.
Why would we just take on that contract? Are they gunna take Markakis or Kemp?