Oklahomabrave
Anytime Now Frankie...
That's the biggest clue. There is no reason to clear payroll if Gray is the target.
We could be setting up to take a bad contract from the A's, like Axford.
That's the biggest clue. There is no reason to clear payroll if Gray is the target.
Because $28,000,000 X 2 years (potentially with another $22,000,000 if the option vests) > $11,000,000 X 1 year
The prospect(s) going to Detroit would be the key.
He's basically a good Julio and lots of people on here thought Julio was an ace.
Yeah, I guess my point is that if the Tigers are looking to dump salary, you would think they want to completely dump salary. I know Markakis is cheaper, but why take any commitments back?
I agree he is better than Julio. I just don't think Julio is an ace.
That's the biggest clue. There is no reason to clear payroll if Gray is the target.
We could be setting up to take a bad contract from the A's, like Axford.
I really hope we are not in on Verlander. a declining pitcher of his age at that price is a killer for a mid market team. We already have Kemp.. are we wanting the pitching version of that.
I really hope we are not in on Verlander. a declining pitcher of his age at that price is a killer for a mid market team. We already have Kemp.. are we wanting the pitching version of that.
Verlander would actually be a positive contributor instead of replacement level
But at what level? Is he a 6 WAR pitcher like last year or a 2 WAR pitcher like 3 of the 4 last years. There is contributing and then there is 28 million dollars worth of contributing.
Why would the Tigers dump Verlander to get rid of his salary and then take back salary in the process?
At least with Markakis they are saving 17 million in 2018, and the full 28 million in 2019.
That is getting closer to accomplishing something that Detroit might value, I think. Need better than Sims though. I would still want a front end pitching prospect and one or more other pieces if I was Detroit.
Verlander would actually be a positive contributor instead of replacement level
Then look at it from our side. We need to move Markakis sometime before midseason next year, assuming Kemp is entirely unmovable. If we're going to get rid of him, I want to either get something back or at least not give up anything else. Why move him plus something else to take on even more salary? Verlander could be good for us...or he could not be good for us. I don't want to find the answer out for almost $30 million/year.
Then look at it from our side. We need to move Markakis sometime before midseason next year, assuming Kemp is entirely unmovable. If we're going to get rid of him, I want to either get something back or at least not give up anything else. Why move him plus something else to take on even more salary? Verlander could be good for us...or he could not be good for us. I don't want to find the answer out for almost $30 million/year.