Peraza debuts for Dodgers

Nobody has been able to justify to me why we traded for an injured, 30 year old player who has all of 13 minor league baseball games under his belt, and won't truly be needed until his 32 year old season, is a good deal.
 
Nobody has been able to justify to me why we traded for an injured, 30 year old player who has all of 13 minor league baseball games under his belt, and won't truly be needed until his 32 year old season, is a good deal.

We needed some more older guys for leadership
 
Because you need to give something to get something?

Sure. But middle of the order bats are the best thing in baseball. Pitching is everywhere right now. IMO the Braves overpaid on the hopes that Olivera is a legit bat. Not something a rebuilding team should do imo.
 
Sure. But middle of the order bats are the best thing in baseball. Pitching is everywhere right now. IMO the Braves overpaid on the hopes that Olivera is a legit bat. Not something a rebuilding team should do imo.

But if they calculated right then they get surplus value. Every team has to take risks.
 
But if they calculated right then they get surplus value. Every team has to take risks.

So we traded two of our best assets to hope that a 32 year old who can't get on the field will be a stud?

Do you think that was a risk worth taking?
 
So we traded two of our best assets to hope that a 32 year old who can't get on the field will be a stud?

Do you think that was a risk worth taking?

C9nsidering how I feel how about Woods future I don't have strong feelings either way. Maybe there were better deals out there but I don't know how the league views woods future.

It wasn't a great trade but I don't think it was a bad one as well. I like the pick coming back in a very deep draft as well as the upside of bird based on scouting reports. Just wish we could have included someone else other than Peraza.
 
Nobody has been able to justify to me why we traded for an injured, 30 year old player who has all of 13 minor league baseball games under his belt, and won't truly be needed until his 32 year old season, is a good deal.

no one has been able to justify it to your liking. plenty of non-Braves homers understand why we did it.
 
You have to believe in Olivera to be a middle of the order bat to think otherwise. And if that was the case then why did LA give up such a commodity

because they have a glut of MIFers and not much young cheap SP? not too crazy to see.
 
You may be in luck. There are all kinds of rumors out there that he’s not 30.

I remember Ben Badler from BA addressing this question over the Winter. Apparently, it's really difficult for Cuban players to get false papers and fake their ages, names, etc. Very different situation than what you see with other Latin countries like DR. So at least on that front with Olivera, we should be safe.
 
C9nsidering how I feel how about Woods future I don't have strong feelings either way. Maybe there were better deals out there but I don't know how the league views woods future.

It wasn't a great trade but I don't think it was a bad one as well. I like the pick coming back in a very deep draft as well as the upside of bird based on scouting reports. Just wish we could have included someone else other than Peraza.

Wood has been one of the 40 best pitchers in baseball over the last 2 seasons. Producing numbers similar to guys like Clay Buchholz, Francisco Liraino, and Shields. But was under team control. If other teams in baseball didn't see that value, then **** them and you keep him.

In the end the Braves were truly in desperate desire to sign Olivera, that they paid a premium to basically avoid his signing bonus.
 
Wood and Peraza ain't getting Moncada, by the way.

If that doesn't at least get you close, then the value of pitching isn't close to the value of hitting on the market...and we just added tons and tons of pitching in the hopes of using its value to add hitting. So that may not work out so well.

But I would have taken Nick Williams and another piece over Olivera.
 
Back
Top