CyYoung31
Shift Leader
I want this to be the reason but something is telling me this was always going to be Heywards career. He is just a terrible hitter.
Except that before he got hit in the face he was a great hitter.
I want this to be the reason but something is telling me this was always going to be Heywards career. He is just a terrible hitter.
Except that before he got hit in the face he was a great hitter.
‘10 = Jhey ops’d at .849 his rookie year aided by an anomaly bb rate, 14.6% (hasn’t broke 11.2 since)
‘11 = .708
‘12 = .814
‘13 = .776 (hit in face)
‘14 = .735
‘15 = .797
‘16 = .631
‘17 = .715
So, 2 years after getting hit in the face, he had his 3rd best offensive season. Hit in the face is just an excuse imo.
See, this is bull****. I'm not sure how much correlation him getting hit in the face actually had, but the fact is he would've OPS'd north of .800 3 of his first 4 years and showed good power before the incident. It may not be due to the injury, but let's not pretend that Heyward wasn't a good hitter before that. Something screwed up his swing.
The reasoning was that Davis threw 44 pitches on Thursday and wasn't available to pitch more than 1 inning. If Maddon used him for 1 out in the 9th he wasn't going to bring him out again in the 10th after letting him sit for a half inning. He needed Lackey to get 1 out, then would have used Davis to get 3 outs in the 10th.
To me, the biggest mistake he made was not getting Schwarber or Happ an AB against Morrow or Jansen. Almora had no business taking PAs against those RHed pitchers.
"Would have" 3 of 4 years? So we're just saying it's a lock he would've done it in 13 and 14? that's quite the conclusion to reach. much more likely the league adjusted to him and he didn't adjust back.
Umm...no. What do you not understand about "before the injury". He was on pace to do it in 13 before he got hurt. That means he would've done it in 10, 12, and 13.
And it normally doesn't take 5 years for MLB pitchers to adjust.
I missed the '10 season above the '11.
He was not on pace to do it in '13 tho. He was at .776, so he was "on pace" for that. He posted a .708 the year before, so I'm not going to assume he would reach and stay at 8. So, 2 of 4 years with one being .708.
I'd say pitchers are constantly making adjustments to young hitters.
You must have missed the 13 season, because Heyward was on fire before the setback.
There's no doubt in my mind that he would have eclipsed it again, considering he'd already done it twice, including the previous year. That entire year was a trainwreck for him as far as freak injuries.
‘10 = Jhey ops’d at .849 his rookie year aided by an anomaly bb rate, 14.6% (hasn’t broke 11.2 since)
‘11 = .708
‘12 = .814
‘13 = .776 (hit in face)
‘14 = .735
‘15 = .797
‘16 = .631
‘17 = .715
So, 2 years after getting hit in the face, he had his 3rd best offensive season. Hit in the face is just an excuse imo.
Well if you believe it then we may as well carve it in stone as something that would have happened haha. Someone go update his player page!
The facts are he had a .771 OPS over 400 PAs at the time of the injury on August 21. To top .800 in the remaining ~150 PAs he had remaining that season, he would have needed to post an OPS of ~.875.
In the 23 months he had played to that point, he hit that mark in 7 of them. So I'd say he had a 30% chance of topping an .800 OPS in 2013.
When you look beyond the total numbers you will find the answer. Heyward as a hitter changed after he got hit.
ISO
10: 179
11: 162
12: 210
13: 173 (year he got hit)
14: 113
15: 146
16: 094
17: 130
His good year with the Cards is propped up by having a higher BABIP than expected on ground balls which is all that he does now.
he didnt
When you look beyond the total numbers you will find the answer. Heyward as a hitter changed after he got hit.
ISO
10: 179
11: 162
12: 210
13: 173 (year he got hit)
14: 113
15: 146
16: 094
17: 130
His good year with the Cards is propped up by having a higher BABIP than expected on ground balls which is all that he does now.