No - that is not what I said. I said "the bad would have walloped the good if not for the Swanson deal"
How is the Olivera deal a wash? Because of it, we lost productive young assets and instead are paying a 1WAR player $18M a year for 3 years. I think that compounded the badness of the deal
Because those young assets aren't productive?
In 22 starts since the trade, Wood has been mediocre. Peraza has been replacement-level.