REAL FOOTBALL Thread

Chop - you were watching the game. Lions were DOMiNATING. The game completely turned on that call. They go up 3 scores and it’s just about over.

I dont think it's over if they take a FG there. But obviously they should have.
 
Lol the lions covered

Basically Campbell played the math... his players didn't execute

Campbell thought touchdowns were necessary to win. He didn't realize how soft the 49ers defense was

I know going for it is his schtick so it’s hard to hold it against him. I just think getting some points and making the 49ers return a kick would have helped settle his team down. Having watched several playoff meltdowns in my lifetime, I believe in momentum and fear win probability like the plague.
 
I know going for it is his schtick so it’s hard to hold it against him. I just think getting some points and making the 49ers return a kick would have helped settle his team down. Having watched several playoff meltdowns in my lifetime, I believe in momentum and fear win probability like the plague.

You might be right

But when youre going against a juggernaut favorite, you need points, in my opinion

Luckily for SF, the lions didn't execute. The 49ers are very lucky
 
I know going for it is his schtick so it’s hard to hold it against him. I just think getting some points and making the 49ers return a kick would have helped settle his team down. Having watched several playoff meltdowns in my lifetime, I believe in momentum and fear win probability like the plague.

A good data person understands that there are unquantifiable things in the universe that at the present time are not able to be measured. The game would have been close to over if they kicked that FG on the first 4th down attempt.
 
2.2% win probability to go for it

Yall are fine to judge based on results. It's a low iq move but it's easy

[Tw]1751782299295797704[/tw]

How's it a low IQ move? Legit I understand the math aspect to it. But first off 75% success for a 45 yard field goal is meh, Badgley for his career is 77% from 40-49, Last 2 years he's been at around 82%.

Essentially you're saying you're going to take a coin flip to extend a drive that still could end in a field goal
 
How's it a low IQ move? Legit I understand the math aspect to it. But first off 75% success for a 45 yard field goal is meh, Badgley for his career is 77% from 40-49, Last 2 years he's been at around 82%.

Essentially you're saying you're going to take a coin flip to extend a drive that still could end in a field goal

Success rates against a generic defense as well is how I believe the numbers are crunched. Niners defense was playing like crap but it’s still the Niners defense. Success rates on FGs are totally dependent on the kicker.

It’s an awful decision at that point in the game.
 
I know going for it is his schtick so it’s hard to hold it against him. I just think getting some points and making the 49ers return a kick would have helped settle his team down. Having watched several playoff meltdowns in my lifetime, I believe in momentum and fear win probability like the plague.

It's also never a loss to match your opponent when you have a lead. It's like if you're winning 4-0 in baseball and concede a run, putting up a run is a huge for keeping the winning momentum going instead of feeling pressure.
 
How's it a low IQ move? Legit I understand the math aspect to it. But first off 75% success for a 45 yard field goal is meh, Badgley for his career is 77% from 40-49, Last 2 years he's been at around 82%.

Essentially you're saying you're going to take a coin flip to extend a drive that still could end in a field goal

I have a few points...

1. Badgley is OK.. he's much better from shorter distance than long

2. Campbell is aggressive and it's been a huge benefit

3. I would rather a coach who appreciates the math than a coach who is scared of it

The reality is the lions are half as talented as SF, but can beat them because we can outsmart them. That was clear in the scheme. And I'm fine with the coaches doing what theyve done all year. If Reynolds catches the ball, id bet we win the game.

Luckily I'm not low IQ. So I understand that an execution error was the difference, not a strategic one
 
Wonder what success rates of plays are when you’ve got Bosa on the edge hurrying the plays at a ridiculously high clip. Or the fact that the whole dline is filled with studs.

People that don’t actually understand math show themselves in so many ways.
 
I have a few points...

1. Badgley is OK.. he's much better from shorter distance than long

2. Campbell is aggressive and it's been a huge benefit

3. I would rather a coach who appreciates the math than a coach who is scared of it

The reality is the lions are half as talented as SF, but can beat them because we can outsmart them. That was clear in the scheme. And I'm fine with the coaches doing what theyve done all year. If Reynolds catches the ball, id bet we win the game.

Luckily I'm not low IQ. So I understand that an execution error was the difference, not a strategic one

I mean I just posted his stats.

It's fine to gamble on odds when you're tight or losing. But when you're up by 14 and have a good shot of getting a 3 score lead.

At the very least, pound it with Montgomery.
 
I mean I just posted his stats.

It's fine to gamble on odds when you're tight or losing. But when you're up by 14 and have a good shot of getting a 3 score lead.

At the very least, pound it with Montgomery.

Success rate on pass plays against the Niners is slightly different than an average against all fourth downs against all teams.

You’d think an nfl coach in a big spot would understand that.
 
Wonder what success rates of plays are when you’ve got Bosa on the edge hurrying the plays at a ridiculously high clip. Or the fact that the whole dline is filled with studs.

People that don’t actually understand math show themselves in so many ways.

Look we all know you're a fake math guy

You're an excel guy lol
 
For anyone that’s interested I’m actually a Microsoft suite guy which includes knowing Dax/M-Code and yes even excel which is the lifeblood of every finance department in the world. Small things.

So if you’ve got some big data issues you need to solve I can design some awesome data models for you like I do for the wealth management space for firms that manage anywhere from 1B to 70B in client assets.

Happy to validate to any normal people that is curious how it’s done.

Or if you want some advice for the work you’re currently doing I’d love to help and show you how awesome the Microsoft solutions can be.
 
Last edited:
For anyone that’s interested I’m actually a Microsoft suite guy which includes knowing Dax/M-Code and yes even excel which is the lifeblood of every finance department in the world. Small things.

So if you’ve got some big data issues you need to solve I can design some awesome data models for you like I do for the wealth management space for firms that manage anywhere form 1B to 70B in client asserts.

Happy to validate to any normal people that is curious how it’s done.
LOL math guy
 
Success rate on pass plays against the Niners is slightly different than an average against all fourth downs against all teams.

You’d think an nfl coach in a big spot would understand that.

Montgomery up til that point had only had 2 rushes under 5 yards. One for none and one for 1 which was a touchdown. Calling a pass seems stupid unless you have a killer pass play. Andy Reid has some of those dialed up.
 
Or if anyone wants to see my degree in mathematics from Binghamton I’m happy to validate to any normal person.

In the data space a math degree is very well received.
 
Montgomery up til that point had only had 2 rushes under 5 yards. One for none and one for 1 which was a touchdown. Calling a pass seems stupid unless you have a killer pass play. Andy Reid has some of those dialed up.

The risk outweighed the reward by far and your point was great in that you could have likely ended with a FG anyway (albeit with more time taken off the clock)
 
Back
Top