REAL FOOTBALL Thread

BRule said:
No idea, I didn't lock it....saw it was locked and started a new one.
Click to expand...

ZITTTTTTTTTTTTTOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

:Gasp:

On a side note, you're a mod here honey. Why didn't you just unlock it? I mean real talk, what the hell am I paying you for? To be eye candy?
 
Heyward said:
Pats were probably ****ed but hard to tell.

More surprised they threw a flag with the game on the line though.
Click to expand...

It was a blatent penalty. My first thought when they waved it off was " How would they know what was uncatchable if he hadn't bear hugged him out of the back of the EZ?"
 
KeithLockhart said:
ZITTTTTTTTTTTTTOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

:Gasp:

On a side note, you're a mod here honey. Why didn't you just unlock it? I mean real talk, what the hell am I paying you for? To be eye candy?
Click to expand...

Idk, was posting from my phone and just assumed we reached whatever limit of posts per thread there was.
 
Hawk said:
Sounds like Zito drank one too many of those fancy IPAs
Click to expand...

Most likely it was the deadly combo of ice cream for breakfast, clear starburst for a snack, follow by a mustard sandwich that was downed with that fancy IPA.
 
BRule said:
Most likely it was the deadly combo of ice cream for breakfast, clear starburst for a snack, follow by a mustard sandwich that was downed with that fancy IPA.
Click to expand...

Eww mustard sandwich.

I don't remember locking the thread. Must have been my phone
 
Ryan has faced through week 11 far and away the toughest defenses of any QB in the NFL. With aside from a few weeks, virtually no weapons.

Falcons are gonna kill it next year when they get some line help through the draft. Hopefully they keep the sucking so they can trade down a few spots and get some more picks.
 
zitothebrave said:
Ryan has faced through week 11 far and away the toughest defenses of any QB in the NFL. With aside from a few weeks, virtually no weapons.

Falcons are gonna kill it next year when they get some line help through the draft. Hopefully they keep the sucking so they can trade down a few spots and get some more picks.
Click to expand...

Just need Jax to win a few more down the stretch. Lot more realistic with Henne than Gabbert. I expect us to be in the top 5 for sure. I'll take higher now that we have that wage scale thingy.
 
BRule said:
http://t.co/HcGu81K2V9

This isn't god for RG3
Click to expand...

"Last week, Griffin’s leadership was called into question, albeit by someone who has not been around the Redskins much at all: Hall of Famer Darrell Green. Players, knowing they could not get into a public spat with a guy like Green, responded privately with incredulity. Everyone I talked to privately about this raved about Griffin’s leadership."

"But one part of his responsibility is accepting full blame. The Washington Post’s Sally Jenkins wrote on that topic. Yes, Griffin needs to learn this. I don’t know if it’s an unwillingness to do so, or a desire to give a full explanation of a play, which is what he did Sunday night. He talked about how no one was open; he talked about how a guy was coming straight at him. Both things were true. It just took a long time for him to say, “It was something I shouldn’t do.” To many, that phrase got lost in the shuffle -- that’s not necessarily Griffin’s problem, by the way. Sometimes it’s a matter of reading the entire quote. Still, it should have been the only thing he said about this play."

"Moss, on 106.7 The Fan’s LaVar and Dukes show, said, “As a leader, you understand that if you’re involved in the situation, whether you’re the receiver, the quarterback, the guys making the tackle, whoever, regardless of the outcome, good or bad, you have to at some point, stand up and say 'me' or 'I.'"

"That’s fine. Griffin did say "I," but again, it was buried. He has to understand how his words will be dissected, especially if they appear to be a shot at the coaches. Griffin never directly said the Eagles knew what plays were coming; but he did say, “When it came to the passing game, a lot of times they were tit for tat. They were where they needed to be; they were taking away routes we were trying to run. That’s disheartening, but we have to make sure we come up with something to counteract that.”

Later in his Sunday presser, Griffin said the Redskins' offense had not become predictable. But that would be lost because his first statement, about coming up with something to counteract it, is the siren. Desired or not, it goes back to coaching. And his relationship with those coaches remains a big topic. The problem is, it’s not the first time Griffin has said something that leads to everyone reading between the lines when it comes to the coaches. (Another thing lost in the shuffle: What if Griffin is right? But given the history here, it's better said in private.) "
 
gilesfan said:
"Last week, Griffin’s leadership was called into question, albeit by someone who has not been around the Redskins much at all: Hall of Famer Darrell Green. Players, knowing they could not get into a public spat with a guy like Green, responded privately with incredulity. Everyone I talked to privately about this raved about Griffin’s leadership."

"But one part of his responsibility is accepting full blame. The Washington Post’s Sally Jenkins wrote on that topic. Yes, Griffin needs to learn this. I don’t know if it’s an unwillingness to do so, or a desire to give a full explanation of a play, which is what he did Sunday night. He talked about how no one was open; he talked about how a guy was coming straight at him. Both things were true. It just took a long time for him to say, “It was something I shouldn’t do.” To many, that phrase got lost in the shuffle -- that’s not necessarily Griffin’s problem, by the way. Sometimes it’s a matter of reading the entire quote. Still, it should have been the only thing he said about this play."

"Moss, on 106.7 The Fan’s LaVar and Dukes show, said, “As a leader, you understand that if you’re involved in the situation, whether you’re the receiver, the quarterback, the guys making the tackle, whoever, regardless of the outcome, good or bad, you have to at some point, stand up and say 'me' or 'I.'"

"That’s fine. Griffin did say "I," but again, it was buried. He has to understand how his words will be dissected, especially if they appear to be a shot at the coaches. Griffin never directly said the Eagles knew what plays were coming; but he did say, “When it came to the passing game, a lot of times they were tit for tat. They were where they needed to be; they were taking away routes we were trying to run. That’s disheartening, but we have to make sure we come up with something to counteract that.”

Later in his Sunday presser, Griffin said the Redskins' offense had not become predictable. But that would be lost because his first statement, about coming up with something to counteract it, is the siren. Desired or not, it goes back to coaching. And his relationship with those coaches remains a big topic. The problem is, it’s not the first time Griffin has said something that leads to everyone reading between the lines when it comes to the coaches. (Another thing lost in the shuffle: What if Griffin is right? But given the history here, it's better said in private.) "
Click to expand...

Let me guess, a DC writer defending him?
And it's not true that "no one was open," I saw a review where they showed the check down man was wide open.
It was a terrible decision and RG3 passed blame, not sure that's debatable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top