Incorrect. Julio would have been Julio anywhere. What he did at the end of his career when he was a shell of his former self is irrelevant.
Was Tron better than Julio? Sure, but Julio is still solidly a top 10 WR all time. So acting like he isn't close is silly.
I love Julio, he's not top 10 all time.
Rice, Megatron, Moss, Marvin Harrison, Fitz, T.O. Largent, Tim Brown, James Lofton, Lance Alworth, all get him. He's in that next group with Reggie Wayne, AB, Torey Holt, Isaac Bruce, Steve Smith, Andre Johnson, Charley Taylor, Michael IRvin, Paul Warfield, etc.
He's not remotely bad, he's one of the best of his generation. But he's not top 10 all time, he's barely top 5 since 2000 (or 2000 era as I want to lump Harrison and Moss who had a chunk of career before 2000 but did most of their damage in the 2000s) as he's behind Moss, Harrison, Fitz and Wayne, and I think you could make a case for AB, Andre Johnson, Torry Holt, Boldin, Brandon Marshall, D-Hop, Mike Evans, Davante. Etc.
What Julio has on a lot of the guys there was his highs were higher, but what he has against him that Johnson, Boldin, D-Hop, Evans, and Davante don't is health. Julio constantly missed games and snaps with injuries.
I love Julio but to highlight the difference in dominance of Johnson vs him Julio has played 13 seasons, many of them banged up of course, but he had about 8 or 9 relatively healthy seasons. But still
MEgatron started 96.3% of his total games played and had 10.1 Targets per start. Julio has started 92.2% of his games and has 9.3 Targets per start. So despite having potentially more targets because of targets in games he wasn't a starter (this year for example, he had 8 targets in his 4 starts, vs 11 when he didn't start) Megatron was just fed at a higher rate because he was on the field more that's a knock against Julio.