REAL FOOTBALL Thread

Bj1133 said:
I don't understand how what you are saying related to the call I'm talking about. Sea fumbled the ball, Bowman recovered it and the refs thought the ball was still alive which was then recovered by a Sea player. Could have easily been reviewed and corrected.
Click to expand...

May be we're talking about different plays.
 
AerchAngel said:
people in the booth called it a pick and various articles as well. Every team picks, just don't get caught. Edelman jacked up DRC on a possible pick/legal block but I do agree with you, just a solid football play, just like Welker's block/pick/obstruction and he wasn't flagged.

He was not trying to hurt Talib and that is my bottom line especially when you are MUCH smaller than that player. And Belecheat whines about it but when you accuse him and his team of playing dirty he gets angry and say it is just football. Great coach but as classless as they come when he is criticized.
Click to expand...

While I hate the Pats, you are dead wrong on this. The plays are nowhere near similar. Welker's PICK was illegal as hell, though I doubt he was trying to seriously injure him. Edelman's BLOCK was completely legal, though I'm sure the Pats ran a similar play or two at some point in the game.
 
Sucks Kaepernick was born with DNA that doesn't allow him to win a big game...

I was unaware they had that kinda technology back then...but now I see why he was adopted.
 
GMAJAH25 said:
Sucks Kaepernick was born with DNA that doesn't allow him to win a big game...

I was unaware they had that kinda technology back then...but now I see why he was adopted.
Click to expand...

Kaep has already won more playoff games than Romo but I am nervous that he tightens up in the big games. Its certainly something to be concerned with moving forward.
 
thethe said:
The rule (according to Periera) is that you have to allow the punter to land on his plant foot. If thats the rule then thats a roughing the kicker.
Click to expand...

That's not the rule.

The rule verbatim is

Any unnecessary roughness committed by defensive players is roughing the kicker. Severity of
contact and potential for injury are to be considered.

Most punters take a small one foot hop, that's about it, Lee hopped over a yard.
 
zitothebrave said:
That's not the rule.

The rule verbatim is

Any unnecessary roughness committed by defensive players is roughing the kicker. Severity of
contact and potential for injury are to be considered.

Most punters take a small one foot hop, that's about it, Lee hopped over a yard.
Click to expand...

There is no definition for the proper plant for a punter. Rolling up on his plant foot is the exact definition of potential for injury.

Again, I have said over and over the penalties was not the reason they lost this game. Kaep choking was the reason.
 
zitothebrave said:
If Romo had San Fran's D he would have won some more.
Click to expand...

Yup, Romo had horrible teams. Its funny how you portray this argument like Kaep was helped along by the 49ers to win these games. He had record setting performances and really good ones in others.
 
Roughing the kicker is a judgement call. It clearly says it in the rule. They judged he wasn't doing anything that would lead to unnecessary roughness. Pretty simple. They operative is unnecessary roughness. As roughing the kicker is an unnecessary roughness foul, so the necessary part is key.
 
thethe said:
Yup, Romo had horrible teams. Its funny how you portray this argument like Kaep was helped along by the 49ers to win these games. He had record setting performances and really good ones in others.
Click to expand...

With a sick team around him. Put any top QB on the Niners and they at worst do what Kaepernick did, probably more.
 
GMAJAH25 said:
3 first round OL ?

HOF RB?
Click to expand...

How was that running game yesterday? Do we give Kaep a pass because the offensive line sucked or that the defense gave up a TD that they should never give up? Can we be fair with that for this game? I mean, if we are giving most of the credit to the defense and running game for the wins shouldn't we criticize them when they don't play well?
 
Stack the box and play physical man coverage...

Kaep's first read is taken away. He had a good game running the ball, good for him. But that was all he was gonna be able to do.

In crunch time...Kaepernick locks on to his #1 and throws the game ending interception. He turned the ball over 3 times and it should have been 4 (nice bounce to that ****ty OL for the recovery)

Take away the guy Kaep identifies as the #1 option at the line and he will either run...or throw that **** anyway in a panic.
 
Because they have a hell of a defense that executes an appropriate game plan.

They shut down what SF could usually do well...

Kaepernick tried his best...got his rush on again (which I like)

But he needed more than that...and he really cannot provide that at this point in his career. This is mostly about going extreme in order to counteract the other extreme that has been displayed here..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top