Yeah as if the game was a real game once it was realized that our third string starter wasn’t returning for the game.
Your take here is as good as your political takes.
Niners were easily the better team.
If the team wasn’t completely deflated from losing their third starting qb for the season it would have been an easy niner win.
Niners were not easily the better team. Maybe if they had Jimmy G they'd be better than the Eagles. But they were not beating the Eagles with Brock Purdy.
If Dak didn't **** the bed, the Niners woudln't have made the Championship game.
People hype Brock Purdy up, but look at who he beat
Miami at the start of their freefall at home, Tampa at home, in Seattle, Commanders at home, OT win in Vegas, home vs. Az, Home vs. Seattle, home vs. Dallas.
Only 2 of those wins would be good. At Seattle and Dallas, and as I asid, Dallas wins that game if Dak wasn't Dak.
Ranking thos teams by Pass DVOA you find Seattle at 17, Tampa at 15, Miami 25, Was 13, Vegas 31, Arizona 21, Dallas 3. Purdy didn't do much vs. Dallas. 6.4 NY/A and 0 TDs. If he kept his Reg season average he would have thrown for 2 TDs and had 7.13 NY/A. So Dallas's defense shut him down. Best you can bet is that Niners score around 19 points. Eagles on the year scored under 20 POints 2 times, At Indy (that was a bad game) and vs. New Orleans WIth Garner Minshew as a QB.