Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

Trumps actions and tweets scream GUILTY. Whether he is guilty or not, he thinks he is guilty of something bad.
 
Mifsud, they write, “was always a ‘Clintonist.’”


Lol...you guys are too much. What's the next hoop to jump through?
 
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/05/26/the_maltese_phantom_of_russiagate_.html

First it was the dossier

Then it was Mifsud

Now it's intercepted comms.

Can the deep state make up their mind? Or is it changing because we continue to learn their stories are lies?

Surely your mind is expansive enough to contemplate that maybe, just maybe, all of those things played a role in casting enough suspicion around the campaign to warrant opening a counterintelligence investigation...which, per no less an authority than Captain Benghazi himself, was the right decision.
 
Surely your mind is expansive enough to contemplate that maybe, just maybe, all of those things played a role in casting enough suspicion around the campaign to warrant opening a counterintelligence investigation...which, per no less an authority than Captain Benghazi himself, was the right decision.

A document sourced by Russians

The misrepresented accounts of a clintonite?

The word of a deep stater on comms that we have no support of?

Come on Julio. When are we going to see real evidence?
 
Mifsud, they write, “was always a ‘Clintonist.’”


Lol...you guys are too much. What's the next hoop to jump through?

I guess his friend and benefactor Stephan Roh who is one of the peddlers of the Clintonist conspiracy is himself part of that conspiracy.
 
I guess his friend and benefactor Stephan Roh who is one of the peddlers of the Clintonist conspiracy is himself part of that conspiracy.

FBI did a really poor job over the years of identifying mifsud as a Kremlin agent. How can we trust any of their judgement's now?

Just admit it guys. You fell for it and now have so much invested you are choosing to ignore the obvious truth in front of you.
 
FBI did a really poor job over the years of identifying mifsud as a Kremlin agent. How can we trust any of their judgement's now?

Just admit it guys. You fell for it and now have so much invested you are choosing to ignore the obvious truth in front of you.

So who does Mifsud work for?
 
I thought he worked for the Clintons. Who else would be able to feed him the information about her emails. Who else would have ordered him to cultivate Papadopoulos. The Clintons. That's who.

If he is leaning anywhere its certainly that way
 
“President Trump himself in the Comey memos said if anyone connected with my campaign was working with Russia, I want you to investigate it, and it sounds to me like that is exactly what the FBI did,” Gowdy told host Martha MacCallum. “I think when the president finds out what happened, he is going to be not just fine, he is going to be glad that we have an FBI that took seriously what they heard.”

“I am even more convinced that the FBI did exactly what my fellow citizens would want them to do when they got the information they got, and that it has nothing to do with Donald Trump,” Gowdy said. Asked about the president’s tweets on the subject, he added that such statements could be subject to questioning by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III.
 
Asked to respond to Gowdy’s remarks, a Fox News commentator known for defending the president also cast doubt on Trump’s claims. Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano (better known and often quoted by Trump as Judge Napolitano) said claims that the FBI placed an undercover spy on Trump’s campaign “seem to be baseless.”

“There is no evidence for that whatsoever,” Napolitano said. The fact that the FBI source spoke with “people on the periphery of the campaign,” he said, “is standard operating procedure in intelligence gathering and in criminal investigations.”
MacCallum, the Fox News anchor, pressed Napolitano, asking him, “if that were the case and the president said, ‘I want to know if anybody’s working with Russia,’ why was he not sort of clued in to that?”

Napolitano, a former New Jersey Superior Court judge, replied that “frankly, that’s a judgment call.”

“I understand the president’s frustration that he was not informed of the fact that his campaign was being investigated,” Napolitano said. “Would I have told the candidate? I would have. But I respect the judgment of those who decided not to tell him. If they were there for some nefarious reason, the one Giuliani suggested, to gather data from the campaign and pass it to the West Wing and pass it to Mrs. Clinton, I’d want to see evidence before I made an allegation that outrageous.”
 
Back
Top