Julio3000
<B>A Chip Off the Old Rock</B>
[TW]975896883267850240[/tw]
Threats of legislation from a party that is completely shut out of power must be fairly compelling.
[TW]975896883267850240[/tw]
The censorship of conservative voices doesn't exist.
It's just not very compelling.
And when you're guilty you get your staffers to sign non-disclosure agreements."When you are innocent … act like it," Gowdy said on “Fox News Sunday“ when asked about Trump's repeated Twitter attacks on Mueller, whose probe has become increasingly perilous to the president and his inner circle. "If you’ve done nothing wrong, you should want the investigation to be as fulsome and thorough as possible."
Obama was improperly seizing data? Well, we all knew he was a constitution expert but I had no idea he was a skilled hacker, too.[tw]975892436646952961[/tw]
And when you're guilty you get your staffers to sign non-disclosure agreements.
Donald says, "According to two sources, the areas that the special counsel investigators have indicated they want to pursue with Trump are the President's role in crafting a statement abroad Air Force One that miscast Donald Trump Jr.'s campaign June 2016 meeting with Russians in Trump Tower, the circumstances surrounding that Trump Tower meeting as well as the firings of FBI Director James Comey and national security adviser Michael Flynn.
What's the smoking gun count at now?
The report reveals that Cambridge Analytica was behind everything on the Trump campaign, from the research to the ad campaigns.
It shows that Cambridge Analytica was actively planting false stories and using false fronts to disguise the source of information.
It confirms what Republican Representative Mike Conaway already let slip—that Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee actively avoided finding any issues.
And when Trump began using the phrase "fake news", he was well-briefed on the fact that he had several fake news factories of his own working 'round the clock.
Even I am a little impressed at the degree to which his sordid schemes seems to have reached.
I dunno, I would say that Nix's account of his questioning by the HPSCI may demonstrate that they weren't particularly interested in any kind of substantial fact-finding.