i think the case is pretty well established by now...it includes
1) financial elements...the negotiations for the tower in Moscow envisioned profits in the hundreds of millions for Trump and a penthouse for Putin...very cozy...and denied throughout the campaign...note that the Moscow tower is but one of a number of financial entanglements between Trump and his minions and the Rooskies
2) collaboration between GRU (the hacker), WikiLeaks (which received and disseminated the stolen goods) and the campaign (which knew about the whole thing and sought to find out what WikiLeaks had and provided advice on its dissemination)
3) quid pro quo for 1 & 2 above in the form of policy changes (GOP platform on Ukraine), including sanctions...it is likely that some of the motivation for the various backchannels was to implement the quid pro quo while circumventing normal U.S. government review of such policy changes
4) other...and here i include possible collaboration on messaging, sharing of polling information, etc etc
And now Corsi questioning his memory
This gets better and better
Jerome Corsi has been trying to save his own ass for months. Even SCO knows his whole divine enlightenment schtick was garbage.
I find it hard to believe there is still anyone arguing whether there was collusion/conspiracy.
What a waste of time they are. Rumsfeld called them "dead enders"
is immaterial at this point.
...................
Whether Trump himself gets impeached or goes to prison - His campaign (not HRC's or The former Gov of NM) the Trump Campaign colluded to conspire with Russia to tilt the 2016 election
Which is/was against the law.
A High Crime .
I personally don't think the House will impeach and I don't see Trump getting re elected
We'll see
Independent of any other considerations of quid pro quo, backchannels, and obstruction of justice after the fact, how does the Trump campaign—>Stone—>Wikileaks thing not look like a criminal conspiracy all on its own?
Looks like damn fine investigative work to me!
We still have yet to have an open discussion of the content of those releases.
Independent of any other considerations of quid pro quo, backchannels, and obstruction of justice after the fact, how does the Trump campaign—>Stone—>Wikileaks thing not look like a criminal conspiracy all on its own?
I hope that since the Dems and Mueller have spent as much time investigating this collusion thing like the GOP did for Benghazi, that they produce as many indictments and arrests as the Republicans did for that successful investigation.