Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

[Tw]1277661461284884481[/tw]

Collusion truths are straight up traitors to the nation and should be held accountable. What a joke how wrong they've been from the beginning.

News outlets are just gl9balist propoganda arms. In no way American and should lose the rights American citizens enjoy until they start getting big stories right again.
 
[Tw]1277929768529399813[/tw]

Deep state still working hard to make America weaker.

Obama/Bush did incalculable damage to the country and its institutions.
 
It is said that Trump is not known to regularly or completely read the President’s Daily Brief and instead relies on oral briefings several times a week. The White House has maintained in coy and carefully selected language that the president was “not personally briefed” on the Russian bounty intelligence

-TPM


53abed1dfc8600c8b93f79d51afc5494b04dcc05.jpg
 
Last edited:
Sean Patrick Maloney
@RepSeanMaloney
·
Jun 29
I was White House Staff Sec’y. Every document that

goes to POTUS is literally stamped “The President Has Seen”

and a record is kept.

So, let the briefing docs testify.

meaning, a release of the document to House Intel this would go away. Judging by Schiffs comments, the WH has not been forthcoming.
Or even if entire House Intel was briefed by WH yesterday certainly this document would have been on the table waiting for participants
 
thethe said:
Still believing those sources that have lied to you for years.

China continuing to order America to fight Russia for their own safety. Disgusting how pathetic you guys are.
Click to expand...

Child if you're not going to believe the AP, then just go stick your head in your blender cause you it won't do any long term damage
 
zitothebrave said:
Child if you're not going to believe the AP, then just go stick your head in your blender cause you it won't do any long term damage
Click to expand...

Child, if you dont understand ifs not the AP but one of its sources and that these sources have been egregiously wrong for 4 years then you might as well stop commenting on anything ever.
 
yes!!!

i love highlighted pictures of pages tweeted out

it's my favorite style of right wing conspiracy etc ****

i just haven't figured out yet why they love doing it
 
I've long maintained that very poorly chosen one's financial dealings with Russians were something that would prove highly damaging if brought to light.

very poorly chosen one himself declared that Mueller would be crossing a "red line" if he delved into his finances, threatening to shut down the entire investigation over reports that Mueller had subpoenaed Deutsche Bank.

Now we have the Supreme Court ruling that Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance Jr. has the authority to subpoena the records from very poorly chosen one's private accounting firm.

It remains to be seen how much of the information in those records reaches the public. But needless to say there are things in those records that very poorly chosen one very much wants to keep from public view.
 
In the congressional subpoena cases, by a 7–2 vote, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress DOES have the power to subpoena very poorly chosen one's financial records. But it sent the cases down for lower courts to assess separation of powers issues. Eventually, Congress is likely to get the records too, but it will not happen as quickly as with Vance and his grand jury.
 
[tw]1281237612783640577[/tw]

It has been the position of Mazars and the banks that they would comply. The White House has appealed to the courts to prevent compliance. It will take some time for the lower courts to rule on the separation of powers considerations. And their rulings might end up being appealed back to SCOTUS. The Vance case leaves less scope for appeal, but the records will be subject to grand jury confidentiality rules. Of course, they could eventually be revealed as part of an indictment or trial.
 
“In our judicial system, ‘the public has a right to every man’s evidence,’” Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote in the New York case, citing an ancient maxim. “Since the earliest days of the Republic, ‘every man’ has included the President of the United States.”

very poorly chosen one reacted angrily, and inaccurately, on Twitter: “Courts in the past have given ‘broad deference’. BUT NOT ME!”

pauvre bébé
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top