Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

I’ve never seen so much hand wringing over hhs in my life.

You guys are hilarious

I actually agree RFK won’t have nearly as much of an impact as some are suggesting, but to be somewhat fair we’ve never entered a Presidency wondering if the President might just literally fire the scientists in HHS that do the actual work if they disagree. Like it or not, the stain of Project 2025 and its authors’ very close proximity to Trump’s orbit is a reason to worry about typically benign cabinet appointments.
 
Accusations that took place well before he was ever in position or even being considered for a position of real power. And accusations that his accomplice Joel Greenberg has admitted to.

This isn't Cavanaugh or a Trump situation where someone came out the woodwork after 30 years to make some accusations at the last minute when it was convenient for Democrats. These are accusations with merit that were first revealed in Trumps administration and that at least 1 party involved has admitted to have happened.

It was shown that Gaetz was a victim of a shakedown because he comes from money. I’ll go grab some of that evidence for you today.
 
Have you gone to RFKs organization's site? It's absolutely bonkers. Take away the science (that completely refutes their positions), just the number of logical fallacies they tout as proof is stunning.

Their chief argument against vaccines is that diagnoses of chronic illnesses in children have increased since the 80s and so have vaccinations.

So what else has increased since the 80's? The Braves winning percentage for one. So according to their logic, if the Braves rebuild then we should see a drop in childhood chronic illnesses.

The site literally says that if vaccines were safe, why is there so much controversy surrounding them? And the leader of this group is being tasked with America's health. I wouldn't trust him with a spoon much less a federal agency.

Yes because that correlation is as direct as something that is literally injected into children’s bodies. Did you actually write that striker? You seem to have a massive blind spot for vaccines.
 
If she was 17 when it happened and is in her 20s now, Gaetz mathematically had to be in at least his mid-30s.

I wouldn’t call that middle aged - I’m in my 40s and now entering that hallowed zone.

And again, simply just running With allegations that will age terribly over time. You guys just never learn.
 
I was beat over the head with claims of Mayor Pete being a pedophile and groomer for *checks notes* adopting children with his husband. But if Matt Gaetz sleeps with a high school girl, it’s completely fine and we’re all fools being controlled by the media?
 
I was beat over the head with claims of Mayor Pete being a pedophile and groomer for *checks notes* adopting children with his husband. But if Matt Gaetz sleeps with a high school girl, it’s completely fine and we’re all fools being controlled by the media?
 
[tw]1857418296506658873[/tw]

We are just supposed to accept what the health industry tells us. Don’t ask questions! Just like the super effective Covid vax that young healthy people needed to take. Winter of death!!!
 
Paying for sex and sex trafficking aren’t the same thing at all.



Didn’t realize you were such a choir boy. Guess you didn’t have many male friends or at least not a diverse friend group growing up.

You can't be serious. This can't be real life. What sort of back **** insane logic is this???

Who is it that you think supplies the women that are being paid for? If you are paying for sex, at the VERY LEAST you are complicit with sex trafficking, if not out outright supporting it.

I didn't realize a choir boy was the necessary qualifications to not to be ok with sex trafficking. For ****s sake dude, take a step back and read the words you are saying.
 
You can't be serious. This can't be real life. What sort of back **** insane logic is this???

Who is it that you think supplies the women that are being paid for? If you are paying for sex, at the VERY LEAST you are complicit with sex trafficking, if not out outright supporting it.

I didn't realize a choir boy was the necessary qualifications to not to be ok with sex trafficking. For ****s sake dude, take a step back and read the words you are saying.

Drug users I suppose are as bad as traffickers. You are clearly a choir boy if you think paying for sec precludes you from any office. It’s the oldest industry and it’s been happening for thousands of years.

If it’s completely consensual and not minors then there is nothing wrong with it.

You don’t live in the real world if you think paying for sex makes it that someone can’t be a tremendous prosecutor. Child like mindset.
 
I actually agree RFK won’t have nearly as much of an impact as some are suggesting, but to be somewhat fair we’ve never entered a Presidency wondering if the President might just literally fire the scientists in HHS that do the actual work if they disagree. Like it or not, the stain of Project 2025 and its authors’ very close proximity to Trump’s orbit is a reason to worry about typically benign cabinet appointments.

Only if you believe project 2025 at all then it involved hiring a lifelong democrat all along

Lol
 
I wouldn’t call that middle aged - I’m in my 40s and now entering that hallowed zone.



And again, simply just running With allegations that will age terribly over time. You guys just never learn.

You might want to just log off for a minute and touch some grass or something.

But also why even bother challenging the validity of the claims at this point? You’re basically on-record defending the behaviors he’s being credibly accused of. If you think it’s cool for a 35-year-old man to sleep with high school girls and pay for sex, why waste the energy arguing if it’s a setup? It’s apparently only a setup for detail you find irrelevant.
 
Only if you believe project 2025 at all then it involved hiring a lifelong democrat all along

Lol

I don’t take it as gospel, and I don’t think every Democrat or person who dislikes Trump is getting fired in January, man. But Trump picking RFK doesn’t do much for me, because Trump isn’t as concerned with the D vs. R label, so much as if they’ll support him. Where it gets tricky is if he or his team run into objections from people in the federal government who are currently shielded from being replaced each election.
 
Yes because that correlation is as direct as something that is literally injected into children’s bodies. Did you actually write that striker? You seem to have a massive blind spot for vaccines.

Or.... OR... our ability to diagnose diseases has improved dramatically and kids who have ADD or are otherwise autistic aren't simply labeled as a "problem child" or mentally retarded.

We are literally living longer than any generation ever and yet somehow vaccinations are killing us.....
 
This is not a time for choir boys. Just sit this one out and enjoy the great country that will be rebuilt.

He likes to pay for sex!!!! Omg what a monster!!!
 
This is not a time for choir boys. Just sit this one out and enjoy the great country that will be rebuilt.

He likes to pay for sex!!!! Omg what a monster!!!
 
Or.... OR... our ability to diagnose diseases has improved dramatically and kids who have ADD or are otherwise autistic aren't simply labeled as a "problem child" or mentally retarded.

We are literally living longer than any generation ever and yet somehow vaccinations are killing us.....

Who said it’s killing peoples? I’m lot even convinced that vaccines are causing issues but I think theee types of things should be studied and not just shutdown as “conspiracies”.
 
Back
Top