Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

So RFK Jr is going to run the HHS. This is awesome! The first step on our journey to back to a 30% infant mortality rate! Gotta get rid of all those vaccines keeping our kids from getting easily prevented childhood illnesses. Winning!

Lol
 
Your opinion seems to be directly formed by Gaetz himself, a collection of grifters who bring Gaetz on their shows, and another one of our nation’s worst elected officials in Luna, so this is rich.

Or I judge character based on what I see of the person - Understand that humans are not Saints and also understand that anyone that is against the establishment and has gravitas to get following is targeted by the establishment. You guys can continue to ignore this aspect we saw playout for the last 8 years.

Either way - When the investigation is 'settled' and Gaetz isn't charged with anything it will be amazing to watch how quickly yall will forget.

OMG! He may have paid for sex! THE MONSTER!!!
 
This is literally the worst possible scenario and there is effectively no proof.

Yet again, you'll just run with it because you're blind while over time the evidence consistently shows I take the right positions in real time. This will be another example of that and you'll forget about it the next time you call me a 'bootlicker'.

Maybe Jon Stewart helped informed your opinion on this matter. That would actually amke sense to me.

That is most certainly not the worst possible scenario. He has also been accused of sex trafficking and paying women for sex. And there are Venmo records that support the accusations.

I mean Jesus Christ dude, can't you even be a little impartial and admit that there are ton of better candidates that don't have sex trafficking accusations against them?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think both sides are drastically overreacting to the RFK selection. He isn't going to change anything.

On one hand, I get that having a nut job, anti-vaxer at the top of the HHS looks bad optically. But he doesn't come with any real power and Trump won't him do anything that would be massively unpopular (like removing vaccine laws). Abolishing the FDA is not something he can do either.

And does anyone know who is the current head of the HHS without googling it? Or any of the past heads of the HHC? Seems more like a figure head position than anything else. Of course, I would generally prefer to have a more qualified, less controversial figure head in place.

He needs to be kept on a short leash. I was hoping he’d be given a “position” where he can stir **** and shine light on topics that haven’t gotten attention, but he shouldn’t be a decision maker.
 
There is a great take that I will try to find on the 10 things that need to be done with the food industry in this country which includes removing subsidies from large companies and return those to smaller farms which will increase variety and reduce overall costs since it will be more localized. Something drastic needs to happen with our food supply because Americans are simply getting to the point where our health care costs will bury us. It’s not the boogeyman of 'free healthcare' team coinflip pushses. It’s the fact that our citizens NEED so much healthcare because they are poisoning themselves every single day.

This is where the alarm bells go off due to my background in Econ, though. You’re absolutely describing an argument that is more left-leaning, but one that doesn’t work for me, because it ignores economies of scale. You cannot simply replace subsidies to larger firms with the same ones to smaller firms and expect prices not to increase because smaller farms don’t have the ability to handle, package and deliver products for the same discounted rates as the larger companies. I think there’s a good argument to be made that the government should subsidize smaller companies to compete with larger ones, but it likely has to be paired with increased support for families as prices increase as a result.
 
Or I judge character based on what I see of the person - Understand that humans are not Saints and also understand that anyone that is against the establishment and has gravitas to get following is targeted by the establishment. You guys can continue to ignore this aspect we saw playout for the last 8 years.

Either way - When the investigation is 'settled' and Gaetz isn't charged with anything it will be amazing to watch how quickly yall will forget.

OMG! He may have paid for sex! THE MONSTER!!!

Once again, I’m hoping to never hear your views on grooming and children again, since apparently it’s not even a consideration for our Attorneys General.
 
Once again, I’m hoping to never hear your views on grooming and children again, since apparently it’s not even a consideration for our Attorneys General.

Grooming is not when a girl is at the youngest 17. You literally don’t even understand what child grooming is and where it happens in the world.
 
That is most certainly not the worst possible scenario. He has also been accused of sex trafficking and paying women for sex. And there are Venmo records that support the accusations.

I mean Jesus Christ dude, can't you even be a little impartial and admit that there are ton of better candidates that don't have sex trafficking accusations against them?

Accusations is the operative word here. You go ahead and run with it only to look stupid later on.
 
Or I judge character based on what I see of the person - Understand that humans are not Saints and also understand that anyone that is against the establishment and has gravitas to get following is targeted by the establishment. You guys can continue to ignore this aspect we saw playout for the last 8 years.

Either way - When the investigation is 'settled' and Gaetz isn't charged with anything it will be amazing to watch how quickly yall will forget.

OMG! He may have paid for sex! THE MONSTER!!!

Yes, I would qualify someone who paid for sex as unfit for office. That is most certainly supporting sex trafficking.

I thought sex trafficking was something you actually cared about, or were those just paper morals?
 
Yes, I would qualify someone who paid for sex as unfit for office. That is most certainly supporting sex trafficking.

I thought sex trafficking was something you actually cared about, or were those just paper morals?

Paying for sex and sex trafficking aren’t the same thing at all.

Didn’t realize you were such a choir boy. Guess you didn’t have many male friends or at least not a diverse friend group growing up.
 
Grooming is not when a girl is at the youngest 17. You literally don’t even understand what child grooming is and where it happens in the world.

If a high school girl sleeping with a middle-aged member of Congress isn’t the type of outcome we’re trying to stop, I guess I don’t understand why you even care about grooming.
 
Grooming is not when a girl is at the youngest 17. You literally don’t even understand what child grooming is and where it happens in the world.

If a high school girl sleeping with a middle-aged member of Congress isn’t the type of outcome we’re trying to stop, I guess I don’t understand why you even care about grooming.
 
If a high school girl sleeping with a middle-aged member of Congress isn’t the type of outcome we’re trying to stop, I guess I don’t understand why you even care about grooming.

Who was middle aged??
 
Man - by this time I figured people would be leery of “accusations”

Guess some never learn.
 
As I have a recent history about overuse of vax and I’d consider myself a healthy person in general I fully support any effort to overhaul the industry that control the poison Americans eat everyday.

I’ll just say here your last take on public health measures didn’t end up look in great for you. This will be another example of that and time will show that to be true.

Medicine is improving yet Americans are getting sicker. There is a reason for that and business as usual won’t cut it anymore.

Have you gone to RFKs organization's site? It's absolutely bonkers. Take away the science (that completely refutes their positions), just the number of logical fallacies they tout as proof is stunning.

Their chief argument against vaccines is that diagnoses of chronic illnesses in children have increased since the 80s and so have vaccinations.

So what else has increased since the 80's? The Braves winning percentage for one. So according to their logic, if the Braves rebuild then we should see a drop in childhood chronic illnesses.

The site literally says that if vaccines were safe, why is there so much controversy surrounding them? And the leader of this group is being tasked with America's health. I wouldn't trust him with a spoon much less a federal agency.
 
Accusations is the operative word here. You go ahead and run with it only to look stupid later on.

Accusations that took place well before he was ever in position or even being considered for a position of real power. And accusations that his accomplice Joel Greenberg has admitted to.

This isn't Cavanaugh or a Trump situation where someone came out the woodwork after 30 years to make some accusations at the last minute when it was convenient for Democrats. These are accusations with merit that were first revealed in Trumps administration and that at least 1 party involved has admitted to have happened.
 
Back
Top