[tw]1888234077675045341[/tw]
I'll believe it when I see it - Lots of talk of this always and nothing ever gets done.
Winning
[tw]1887956732330095019[/tw]
Would also be cool with this, though this seems like it’s either way more or way less complicated than they’re making it sound, with little in between.
Winning
[tw]1887956732330095019[/tw]
Rabble rabble messaging !
[tw]1887669645123125552[/tw]
Everyone underestimates and doesn’t understand Trump.
Not a gripe about messaging, more a light skepticism of how likely it is that an algorithm can be created to do this effectively. They already have people who investigate SS fraud and I’d have to assume there’s already systems in place to detect obvious fraud that triggers additional steps by law enforcement. Maybe there is a way to do it better, but I’m curious what they could do that isn’t already in place.
I still don’t know how it’s remotely viable to accept that Trump is just saying a bunch of intentionally false things to get people to do something *and* that nobody will ever figure that out and call his bluff.
It's called TDS. For a certain part of the population literally anything Trump says is instantly wrong and causes them to have a nervous breakdown.
But his Gaza plan would be wrong and much of the right was having just as much of a nervous breakdown about it as the left. I’m not super confident Trump can continue to aim a gun at his own foot and have other countries bail him out forever. Eventually someone somewhere will say “holy ****, that plan is so clearly bad for Trump that he couldn’t possibly want it to happen” and refuse to engage.
At first glance I'm not ok with taking over Gaza. But I'm not going to freak out over what Trump said I'll see where that eventually takes us. I would suspect most people on the right have the same approach. Not all of course. It's very different from when someone on the left disagrees with Trump.