Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

lol

I didn’t hear this crying about the constitution when Biden was ****ting all over it

Just because Trump.
 
Why would it need to be critical ?

I could name a few, but one thing I won’t be doing this morning is hashing out whether or not the news channel that sends out Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Jesse Watters and Jeanine Pirro each evening shows some sort of bias toward Trump.
 
I think you missed the polls where most approve

They aren’t gonna waste time hyperventilating about the terminology and specific nuance about how it’s getting done like some seem to invest their free time

To my knowledge, you can’t go pro in Pearl clutching
 
I think you missed the polls where most approve

They aren’t gonna waste time hyperventilating about the terminology and specific nuance about how it’s getting done like some seem to invest their free time

To my knowledge, you can’t go pro in Pearl clutching

Lemme hop in my Time Machine real quick to February 2021 and tell you to cool it on criticizing Biden because an even larger majority of people were clearly buying what Joe Biden was selling. Or we can take a trip back to the Obama years, where that number was even higher! Or the Bush Admin or Clinton or the other Bush…
 
Lemme hop in my Time Machine real quick to February 2021 and tell you to cool it on criticizing Biden because an even larger majority of people were clearly buying what Joe Biden was selling. Or we can take a trip back to the Obama years, where that number was even higher! Or the Bush Admin or Clinton or the other Bush…

Of course they were 'buying' what he was selling.

It was a coordinated hit job to hide the truth. Again - Context.
 
[tw]1888607143030391287[/tw]

Of course not - Its just more obstruction type tactics because as MQT said - They don't like Trumps policies.
 
[tw]1888607143030391287[/tw]

Of course not - Its just more obstruction type tactics because as MQT said - They don't like Trumps policies.

I’m seeing a lot of sentiment regarding “telling the executive branch what to do” rather than any discussion of the legal merits of the judge’s ruling. Seems telling that they’re comparing it to a situation where it might be legally dubious such as military operations rather than pointing to statutory evidence.
 
Of course they were 'buying' what he was selling.

It was a coordinated hit job to hide the truth. Again - Context.

As we all know, conservative media would *never* spin anything Trump is doing as more important, legal or effective than it really is.
 
I’m seeing a lot of sentiment regarding “telling the executive branch what to do” rather than any discussion of the legal merits of the judge’s ruling. Seems telling that they’re comparing it to a situation where it might be legally dubious such as military operations rather than pointing to statutory evidence.

The 'legal merit' is completely ancillary to the process because that is not actually why they are bringing it up. Its plain as day but Vance makes a good point either way and from what I'm seeing this type of challenge was expected and the hope is the SC emphasizes the supremacy of the executive branch in how they administer executive duties.
 
As we all know, conservative media would *never* spin anything Trump is doing as more important, legal or effective than it really is.

Conservative media is far more 'fair' when it comes to their candidates as opposed to the MSM that is in lock step on almost every issue. RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA!!!
 
As we all know, conservative media would *never* spin anything Trump is doing as more important, legal or effective than it really is.

Conservative media is far more 'fair' when it comes to their candidates as opposed to the MSM that is in lock step on almost every issue. RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA!!!
 
The 'legal merit' is completely ancillary to the process because that is not actually why they are bringing it up. Its plain as day but Vance makes a good point either way and from what I'm seeing this type of challenge was expected and the hope is the SC emphasizes the supremacy of the executive branch in how they administer executive duties.

It’s a district court making a temporary ruling to pause something that might be illegal. The legal merit isn't ancillary, it’s the only point. If a challenge were expected, it’s because there are statutes suggesting it’s illegal. You had a much different thought process on it when it was student loan forgiveness.
 
Conservative media is far more 'fair' when it comes to their candidates as opposed to the MSM that is in lock step on almost every issue. RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA!!!

You’re literally just describing exactly what I’m describing with a different tone. Conservative media is *at best* the inverse of NBC/CNN. They attack everything the left does, celebrate what the right does and pushes an agenda that their viewers will like. Just because you like what you’re hearing doesn’t make it more fair and balanced.
 
It’s a district court making a temporary ruling to pause something that might be illegal. The legal merit isn't ancillary, it’s the only point. If a challenge were expected, it’s because there are statutes suggesting it’s illegal. You had a much different thought process on it when it was student loan forgiveness.

You know the reason its being presented - Stop dancing around the truth that you just admitted you knew.
 
You’re literally just describing exactly what I’m describing with a different tone. Conservative media is *at best* the inverse of NBC/CNN. They attack everything the left does, celebrate what the right does and pushes an agenda that their viewers will like. Just because you like what you’re hearing doesn’t make it more fair and balanced.

No - the left is literally a mouthpiece for the CIA parroting every single like the past 10 years.

Its embarrassing that anyone wouldn't acknowledge that and pretend Fox is 'just as bad'. Don't get me wrong - Fox is terrible but stop pretending its the same thing.
 
You know the reason its being presented - Stop dancing around the truth that you just admitted you knew.

I didn’t admit anything, I used overly ambiguous language in a message board post. This federal judge hasn’t shut down DOGE, he made a ruling that said we need to pause these steps that were openly legally spurious to begin with until the case can be evaluated fully by the courts.
 
No - the left is literally a mouthpiece for the CIA parroting every single like the past 10 years.

Its embarrassing that anyone wouldn't acknowledge that and pretend Fox is 'just as bad'. Don't get me wrong - Fox is terrible but stop pretending its the same thing.

Keep in mind, Fox is by far the least extreme of the outlets I’m referring to, but still ****ing lol.
 
Back
Top