sturg33
I
do you consider me someone as "soft right"
my position was that there was no upside to it, especially after having been lectured that we have to soften our stance on abortion to win over the childless cat lady
Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread
- Thread starter thethe
- Start date
do you consider me someone as "soft right"
my position was that there was no upside to it, especially after having been lectured that we have to soften our stance on abortion to win over the childless cat lady
Its not you - You're good dude. Just fell off the rails a bit.
Its the online right ecosystem that was completely misled people for their own selfish reasons.
Biden kept disobeying the law and forgiving the loans AFTER the SCOTUS said he couldn't do it.
That should have been impeachment and jail time.
Tapate50
Well-known member
My memory is ****, but I remember him pissing on the constitution well before that.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
That was and still is silly. No one here has or ever will suggest Trump go to jail for an executive order being ruled unconstitutional.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
He probably views him as the puppet he will use to try to retain as much power as possible.its not illegal or unconstitutional but looks pretty bad to voters.
He then said "No, but he's very capable. I think you have a lot of very capable people. So far I think he's doing a fantastic job. It's too early, we're just starting."
https://www.military.com/daily-news...estigious-black-engineering-awards-event.html
Spending your time with the NRA instead of a bunch of engineers to get us back to prioritizing merit.
Vance is incredible and he will take this constructive criticism like the man he is - it will not even be a close primary in 28.
sturg33
I
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Lol
acesfull86
Well-known member
WSJ sums it up nicely:
“ This is political rent-seeking at its most brazen, and it benefits the few at the expense of the many. None of this matters to Mr. Trump, whose dogmatic views on tariffs can’t be turned by evidence.”
One needs to look no further than the last time President Trump occupied the White House, when his administration imposed “national security” tariffs of 25 percent on imported steel and 10 percent on imported aluminum under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. Several economic studies have found that those tariffs imposed high costs on Americans, particularly firms and workers in steel-consuming industries, and the costs dwarfed whatever gains the tariffs led to in terms of increased capacity utilization and employment in US steelmaking (Table 1).
Trump imposed the tariffs in 2018 and they've determined that in that short runway ~1.5 years until the pandemic shutdown (when economy was roaring) that hte book is closed.
How could you possibly beat this type of analysis? Lets just ignore the type of activity that was happening in Q4 19 - That would have absolutely stopped even without the Pandemic. You know things like median income rising at its highest level in decades. Inflation adjusted wages. Some silly inconvenient things in spite of trumps 'reckless' tariff policy.
Trump imposed the tariffs in 2018 and they've determined that in that short runway ~1.5 years until the pandemic shutdown (when economy was roaring) that hte book is closed.
How could you possibly beat this type of analysis? Lets just ignore the type of activity that was happening in Q4 19 - That would have absolutely stopped even without the Pandemic. You know things like median income rising at its highest level in decades. Inflation adjusted wages. Some silly inconvenient things in spite of trumps 'reckless' tariff policy.
Last edited by a moderator:
sturg33
I
(Again)... tariffs have been imposed many times through world history.