Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread
- Thread starter thethe
- Start date
sturg33
I
In the context of polling... yes I think fake and inaccurate are interchangeable
And I presume the fake polls were also in the Feb numbers
The issue is that you seem to think pollsters themselves are more accurate or not based on how pro-Trump they are.
So your conclusion of trumps declining approval is predicated on two clear outliers from historically inaccurate pollsters and you’re cool with this? Don’t want to rethink your conclusion?
sturg33
I
My conclusion is that no matter what happens, if a poll is shown to be negative towards trump you will simply dismiss it at not being real or accurate
I don't need to rethink my conclusion
There are other polls in the average that had Trump underwater - did I reference those? You go ahead and take the average without critical thinking though.
sturg33
I
Im just looking at the trend, man
The trend? Meaning what? The average? Take a look at what two historically inaccurate outliers have done to the “trend”.
This is the same discussion as “Trump can’t win”
For real
Weird, just a few months ago the White House was releasing its list of economic accomplishments and I didn’t see you or this MAGA influencer cheer it on uncritically then.
acesfull86
Well-known member
ThomasSowellQuotes
@ThomasSowell
I'm not Thomas Sowell but I own all of his books and I promote his work. I spread truth and knowledge with quotes, news, and occasional memes.
--------
Please change your twitter handle, sir
[tw]1900949642826969556[/tw]
“I haven’t noticed any improvements but it must be the commies working extra hard” is perhaps the exact outcome the White House is hoping for when reality doesn’t jive with their touted wins. Let’s see if that holds up over 2-4 years.
Saying those 6 months of rockiness are just a necessary adjustment before we usher in centuries of America’s Golden Age is absolutely not critical in any meaningful sense.
The reality of the situation is difficult to deal with I know.