Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

[tw]1903896235611742370[/tw]

"Nobody"? How about your party that just left the door opened and encouraged it for four years straight?

Immigration is still the #1 issue in this country and until the illegals are shipped back home it will remain the #1 issue.
 
[tw]1903842520267624624[/tw]

Democrats are going to scramble hard and do a 180 on so much of what they pushed the last 12 years.
 
[tw]1903842520267624624[/tw]

Democrats are going to scramble hard and do a 180 on so much of what they pushed the last 12 years.

I would be more forgiving if they said "I was wrong. I've learned. Here's why I have changed"

Instead, they will pretend they never held the position to begin with
 
[tw]1903936765284729340[/tw]

There all fake. Whole party support is smoke and mirrors.

When elections are cleaned up we will win in even greater majorities.
 
[tw]1903894908940755222[/tw]

You know you’re going after the hardened criminals when you are going after the people paying taxes.
 
We know you want the executive branch to be ran by everyone but the person who was elected by the people.
 
[tw]1903894908940755222[/tw]

You know you’re going after the hardened criminals when you are going after the people paying taxes.

Who ever said we were stopping at hardened criminals? You think the 10-15m people that the last regime just allowed to walk in are going to stay?
 
I suppose you could just… appeal the ruling?

Ah yes - and just follow the plan exactly with it being held up in court for years and therefore the executive having no ability to change a thing.

We very much understand your philosophy.
 
Ah yes - and just follow the plan exactly with it being held up in court for years and therefore the executive having no ability to change a thing.

We very much understand your philosophy.

…Following the Constitution?
 
[tw]1903825982076666158[/tw]

Silly us thinking the US government should be held to a higher standard than a murderer.
 
…Following the Constitution?

You mean a radical judges interpretation that is obviously deeply biased? Ok - you keep thinking the judiciary should legislate executive functions. Just like a typical Marxist - until of course they are in power.
 
You mean a radical judges interpretation that is obviously deeply biased? Ok - you keep thinking the judiciary should legislate executive functions. Just like a typical Marxist - until of course they are in power.

The judges have a right to halt actions like the Birthright Citizenship EO because it's not in the executive branch's power to change that.

However, these judges stopping things that are clearly in the executive's power is utter bull****.
 
I would be more forgiving if they said "I was wrong. I've learned. Here's why I have changed"

Instead, they will pretend they never held the position to begin with

Why should they? They can convince a big portion of this country by just making up crap (I.e. musk is a nazi).
 
The judges have a right to halt actions like the Birthright Citizenship EO because it's not in the executive branch's power to change that.

However, these judges stopping things that are clearly in the executive's power is utter bull****.

You could always appeal….

3 years later. It’s a joke but of course mqt is for it. Gotta have those trannys in the military!
 
[tw]1903842382338281649[/tw]

But did Hamilton think if the Venezuelan gang members or the trannies?
 
Back
Top