sturg33
I
here is one quick article that shows a piece - I can pick some rural counties across the country and do election over election % results later on when I don't have some deliverables for work.
The second way to see what these midterms might mean for presidential politics is to use statewide vote totals for governor or senator as a proxy for what a presidential vote might be were Trump on the ballot right now. It’s a very imperfect proxy for sure, especially since there is no clear Democratic opponent. But it can give a sense of partisan strength for the presidential race. Let’s start with the three states that Trump won in 2016, surprising the Democrats and giving him his Electoral College victory: Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. Democrats will be heartened to see that, in Pennsylvania and Michigan, Republicans at the top of the ticket did worse than Trump did in 2016. That was not the case in Wisconsin, even though that state’s Republican governor, Scott Walker, lost his race.
Percent Trump vote, 2016 Percent Republican vote for governor, 2018
Pennsylvania 46.2% 40.8%
Michigan 47.5% 44.09%
Wisconsin 47.2% 48.4%
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixg...e-midterms-how-did-they-fare-on-election-day/
Bottom line is the 'only-Trump' voter that never votes will not come out for RDS. Then it will be about what the wine moms do and how much cheating the left gets away with.
The rust belt specifically is big on Trumps policies and not idiotic lets take away social secuirty and medicare.
I believe RDS brings in more voters from never Trumpers than he loses from only Trumpers