Some Red State/Blue State Indicia

sturg33 said:
Meanwhile toddlers are masked in NY and adults are.masked in Philly

[Tw]1513929883184996354[/tw]
Click to expand...

Cue 57 to come in like this "Desantis is the

a04b94f5-03d3-43e5-82c5-3f3dccd4dfff_text.gif
 
landed in Sacramento last night and found massive amounts of despair AND carnage AND oppression AND tyranny

and no electricity at all...everything was dark

SCARY!!!!
 
Sure is some tyranny in the N train in NY.

Lot of folks blaming the govt for the lawlessness they have allowed to continue.
 
Last edited:
if anything the amount of oppression AND tyranny in California exceeds what I left behind in NY

SCARY!!!!!
 
the hilarious thing is the state literally were telling its citizens to unplug their toasters after 3pm bc they couldn't power their state
 
we will be praying for you nsacpi while you wander the lawless societies of the blue

at least until we get you back into a crime free society of the red where nothing ever bad happens
 
goldfly said:
we will be praying for you nsacpi while you wander the lawless societies of the blue

at least until we get you back into a crime free society of the red where nothing ever bad happens
Click to expand...

yes...please keep me in your thoughts and prayers
 
[tw]1509944299634442242[/tw]

Someone is going to need to explain to me how this letter isn’t a reasonable interpretation of the plain text wording of the bill in Florida.
 
mqt said:
[tw]1509944299634442242[/tw]

Someone is going to need to explain to me how this letter isn’t a reasonable interpretation of the plain text wording of the bill in Florida.
Click to expand...

Perhaps it is.

But why are leftists so ****ing upset that they can't talk to kindergartners about sex/sexual identity? Why is there so much pushback to this?
 
mqt said:
[tw]1509944299634442242[/tw]

Someone is going to need to explain to me how this letter isn’t a reasonable interpretation of the plain text wording of the bill in Florida.
Click to expand...

There is an issue that is being tiptoed around. Which is that kids with same sex parents face a bit of bullying in school. It is the sort of thing that school staff should feel empowered to deal with. It isn't "grooming" for a teacher with a kid in his or her class who is being bullied for this reason to discuss with the rest of the class how there can be loving families with two men or two women as the parents.
 
nsacpi said:
There is an issue that is being tiptoed around. Which is that kids with same sex parents face a bit of bullying in school. It is the sort of thing that school staff should feel empowered to deal with. It isn't "grooming" for a teacher with a kid in his or her class who is being bullied for this reason to discuss with the rest of the class how there can be loving families with two men or two women as the parents.
Click to expand...

This is more in line with what I find to be the actual concern with the bill, and what many, many teachers are actually protesting. Most (damn near all) teachers don’t want to delve into the topic of sexual intercourse or their genitalia with young children. It’s the fact that the law can easily be construed in a way that makes any benign conversation about gay people or couples could be in violation of the law, even in the same context that teachers would discuss straight people or couples. If Florida simply passed a bill that banned discussion of sexual topics in these grades for any reason, you wouldn’t see the same backlash, even though it’d have the same “anti-grooming” intent that Republicans claim this bill has. That didn’t happen, though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top