The Biden Presidency

sturg33 said:
Between Biden consistently referencing the civil war to compare today's issues, to making a database of extremists, to monitoring text messages for misinformation, to the CIA asking people to report friends and family who are showing signs of extremism...

one wonders what the end game here is
Click to expand...

Jan 6th didn't go far enough. We have an illegitimate government right now. Each day we are learning more and more and as that evidence is made public the current marxist regime will get more radical and aggressive.

We are at the brink here. Its time for patriots to realize and take the country back.
 
sturg33 said:
Between Biden consistently referencing the civil war to compare today's issues, to making a database of extremists, to monitoring text messages for misinformation, to the CIA asking people to report friends and family who are showing signs of extremism...

one wonders what the end game here is
Click to expand...

You must forgive Biden referencing the Civil War all the time. It was the biggest event of his lifetime.
 
striker42 said:
You must forgive Biden referencing the Civil War all the time. It was the biggest event of his lifetime.
Click to expand...

While true... I'm concerned that he sees so many similarities...

The exact quote, from his written approved speech, was

"I've said it before: We're are facing the most significant test of our democracy since the Civil War. That's not hyperbole. Since the Civil War. "

like wtf
 
sturg33 said:
While true... I'm concerned that he sees so many similarities...

The exact quote, from his written approved speech, was

"I've said it before: We're are facing the most significant test of our democracy since the Civil War. That's not hyperbole. Since the Civil War. "

like wtf
Click to expand...

This is leading to them throwing us into Gulags. Censorship and Force is all they know. The arguments don't resonate with the people and now that the cheating has been uncovered they know they have no shot at elections moving forward. 2022 is going to be an absolute bloodbath.
 
Biden administration showing how much they care about the asylum argument by refusing Cubans.

All the narratives are lies.

Everyone needs to wake up and realize and not take them seriously.
 
When determining the culpability of Kemp/Raffensberger in this whole mess its important to note they knew of these variances back in November. They knew the controls around the election was a nightmare.

A first year auditor could tell you this was fraud.

Guys - Its obvious.
 
I see the tactic to address the clear systemic voter fraud is to ignore it.

Frauds. Always have been and always will be.
 
zbhargrove said:
Nah... just hard to trust a blatantly partisan clown show... not really worth feeding your insanity
Click to expand...

GA is public record fool.

You've got nothing. The narrative that systemic voter fraud doesn't exist is over. We know its real and we know it happened in 2020. The only question now is how much and who is responsible for it.
 
thethe said:
GA is public record fool.

You've got nothing. The narrative that systemic voter fraud doesn't exist is over. We know its real and we know it happened in 2020. The only question now is how much and who is responsible for it.
Click to expand...

speaking as someone who isn't quite as into every step of this "audit process" can you tell me more about it, who's doing it, what they're using for evidence or to check the ballots, who funds them, any possible ties to anyone other than themselves they might have, etc.?

Not trying to start anything here, seriously just asking for specifics.
 
I find it interesting and unsurprising that the totally not racist lefties have nothing to say on Bidens heartless refusal to accept Cuban refugees. "This is not who we are"
 
Oklahomahawk said:
speaking as someone who isn't quite as into every step of this "audit process" can you tell me more about it, who's doing it, what they're using for evidence or to check the ballots, who funds them, any possible ties to anyone other than themselves they might have, etc.?

Not trying to start anything here, seriously just asking for specifics.
Click to expand...

Audits are crowd source funded and Patriots have the opportunity to fund the fight for our nation. The group running the AZ audit is a partisian group. Audit is a science however and the evidence that will be put forward will be iron clad.

Just like the GA fraud is public knowledge for the world to see.

I'm not sure I understand your question on what they are using for evidence. So far in GA they have identfiied duplicate ballots taht were scanned into the public record which were counted into the final certfied results. They also took these summary count sheets and compared them to the underlying ballots which yielded a 60% error rate.

You can't drape this in partisan politics. This is straightforward audit work.

There needs to be more released about the AZ audit but it will be. There are some more extravagant forensic work done on quality of paper and orientation of all markers which is a standard. But in reality its good old hard nosed auditing of taking reported totals down to the lowest level of support and that are the completed ballots.

Whats crazy is this part wasn't supposed to yield issues. The canvassing is where they will identify the majority of the fraud.
 
sturg33 said:
I find it interesting and unsurprising that the totally not racist lefties have nothing to say on Bidens heartless refusal to accept Cuban refugees. "This is not who we are"
Click to expand...

Democrats want to import voters.

Its plain as day.
 
thethe said:
Audits are crowd source funded and Patriots have the opportunity to fund the fight for our nation. The group running the AZ audit is a partisian group. Audit is a science however and the evidence that will be put forward will be iron clad.

Just like the GA fraud is public knowledge for the world to see.

I'm not sure I understand your question on what they are using for evidence. So far in GA they have identfiied duplicate ballots taht were scanned into the public record which were counted into the final certfied results. They also took these summary count sheets and compared them to the underlying ballots which yielded a 60% error rate.

You can't drape this in partisan politics. This is straightforward audit work.

There needs to be more released about the AZ audit but it will be. There are some more extravagant forensic work done on quality of paper and orientation of all markers which is a standard. But in reality its good old hard nosed auditing of taking reported totals down to the lowest level of support and that are the completed ballots.

Whats crazy is this part wasn't supposed to yield issues. The canvassing is where they will identify the majority of the fraud.
Click to expand...


Interesting stuff. The main point of my questions was that how can we be sure that the people doing these audits are any more reliable than the original folks doing the counting. How do we know they're literally counting everything, checking the official voter registration numbers, not "fudging" in their own direction? As you might remember I am and always have been 100% in favor of an absolutely transparent voting system but I don't trust Trumpbots to be any more reliable than Bidenbots (is that one a word yet?).

You get my points, right?
 
Oklahomahawk said:
Interesting stuff. The main point of my questions was that how can we be sure that the people doing these audits are any more reliable than the original folks doing the counting. How do we know they're literally counting everything, checking the official voter registration numbers, not "fudging" in their own direction? As you might remember I am and always have been 100% in favor of an absolutely transparent voting system but I don't trust Trumpbots to be any more reliable than Bidenbots (is that one a word yet?).

You get my points, right?
Click to expand...

They aren't reliable... both the AZ and GA audits are being run by partisan hacks with a clear agenda. I'm fine with fair non-partisan audits... this is a far cry from that.
 
sturg33 said:
I find it interesting and unsurprising that the totally not racist lefties have nothing to say on Bidens heartless refusal to accept Cuban refugees. "This is not who we are"
Click to expand...

I'm frankly quite annoyed at the policies thus far on the Cuban refugee situation but I'm also a far cry from a lefty or righty
 
Oklahomahawk said:
Interesting stuff. The main point of my questions was that how can we be sure that the people doing these audits are any more reliable than the original folks doing the counting. How do we know they're literally counting everything, checking the official voter registration numbers, not "fudging" in their own direction? As you might remember I am and always have been 100% in favor of an absolutely transparent voting system but I don't trust Trumpbots to be any more reliable than Bidenbots (is that one a word yet?).

You get my points, right?
Click to expand...

I don't expect people to take the audit reports at face value. I'd hope the opposition would challenge them and perform similar procedures or explain why those procedures weren't valid.

The AZ audit is live streamed (on a delay) so you can't have any shenaningans.

Again, auditing is a science. You can't create fraud. Favorito didn't forge these count sheets that were 100-0 / 150-0 / 200-0 that didn't reconcile to the underlying ballots. I'd love for someone to give a reason why Favorito is wrong with what he produced yesterday. Just remember that once Favorito provided evidence in court the Fulton County Election officials lawyered up with CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS.

Fraud is fraud and the 2020 election was riddled with it.
 
thethe said:
Audits are crowd source funded and Patriots have the opportunity to fund the fight for our nation. The group running the AZ audit is a partisian group. Audit is a science however and the evidence that will be put forward will be iron clad.

Just like the GA fraud is public knowledge for the world to see.

I'm not sure I understand your question on what they are using for evidence. So far in GA they have identfiied duplicate ballots taht were scanned into the public record which were counted into the final certfied results. They also took these summary count sheets and compared them to the underlying ballots which yielded a 60% error rate.

You can't drape this in partisan politics. This is straightforward audit work.

There needs to be more released about the AZ audit but it will be. There are some more extravagant forensic work done on quality of paper and orientation of all markers which is a standard. But in reality its good old hard nosed auditing of taking reported totals down to the lowest level of support and that are the completed ballots.

Whats crazy is this part wasn't supposed to yield issues. The canvassing is where they will identify the majority of the fraud.
Click to expand...

Don't the ballots have a unique identifier to keep them from being counted more than once, regardless of how often they're scanned? I thought I read that back in November.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top